Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30262903›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Crystallographic texture and mineral concentration quantification of developing and mature human incisal enamel.

Mohammed Al-Mosawi, Graham Roy Davis, Andy Bushby, Janet Montgomery, Julia Beaumont, Maisoon Al-Jawad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mesoscale structural gradients in human tooth enamel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. XMaS @ the ESRF.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed Al-MosawiInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1572-7224
Graham Roy DavisInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-032X
Andy BushbySchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Janet MontgomeryDepartment of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-3088
Julia BeaumontSchool of Archaeological and Forensic Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7166-5857
Maisoon Al-JawadInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom. m.al-jawad@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBDurham University · GBUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For human dental enamel, what is the precise mineralization progression spatially and the precise timing of mineralization? This is an important question in the fundamental understanding of matrix-mediated biomineralization events, but in particular because we can use our understanding of this natural tissue growth in humans to develop biomimetic approaches to repair and replace lost enamel tissue. It is important to understand human tissues in particular since different species have quite distinct spatial and temporal progression of mineralization. In this study, five human central incisors at different stages of enamel maturation/mineralization were spatially mapped using synchrotron X-ray diffraction and X-ray microtomography techniques. From the earliest developmental stage, two crystallite-orientation populations coexist with angular separations between the crystallite populations of approximately 40° varying as a function of position within the tooth crown. In general, one population had significantly lower texture magnitude and contributed a higher percentage to the overall crystalline structure, compared to the other population which contributed only 20-30% but had significantly higher texture magnitude. This quantitative analysis allows us to understand the complex and co-operative structure-function relationship between two populations of crystallites within human enamel. There was an increase in the mineral concentration from the enamel-dentin junction peripherally and from the incisal tip cervically as a function of maturation time. Quantitative backscattered-electron analyses showed that mineralization of prism cores precedes that of prism boundaries. These results provide new insights into the precise understanding of the natural growth of human enamel.

Indexed as

AmelogenesisCrystallography, X-RayDental EnamelHumansIncisorMineralsSynchrotronsTooth CrownX-Ray MicrotomographyMinerals

Identifiers

PMID30262903
PMCPMC6160435
OpenAlexW2891663987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.