Trial reportScientific reports2018
Multisensory perception reflects individual differences in processing temporal correlations.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Articulatory timing and form support distinct neural benefits during audiovisual speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The reliability of multisensory integration in enhancing behavioral performance.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- A representation of abstract linguistic categories in the visual system underlies successful lipreading.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain identified by a time-resolved encoding model.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Individual Differences in Multisensory Interactions:The Influence of Temporal Phase Coherence and Auditory Salience on Visual Contrast Sensitivity.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory signals originating from a single event, such as audiovisual speech, are temporally correlated. Correlated signals are known to facilitate multisensory integration and binding. We sought to further elucidate the nature of this relationship, hypothesizing that multisensory perception will vary with the strength of audiovisual correlation. Human participants detected near-threshold amplitude modulations in auditory and/or visual stimuli. During audiovisual trials, the frequency and phase of auditory modulations were varied, producing signals with a range of correlations. After accounting for individual differences which likely reflect relative unisensory temporal characteristics in participants, we found that multisensory perception varied linearly with strength of correlation. Diffusion modelling confirmed this and revealed that stimulus correlation is supplied to the decisional system as sensory evidence. These data implicate correlation as an important cue in audiovisual feature integration and binding and suggest correlational strength as an important factor for flexibility in these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.