Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30262765›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Tadas Korzinskas, Ole Jung, Ralf Smeets, Sanja Stojanovic, Stevo Najman, Kristina Glenske, Michael Hahn, Sabine Wenisch, Reinhard Schnettler, Mike Barbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Materials advances in GTR membrane: A comprehensive review.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tadas KorzinskasSection for Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. tadaskorzinskas@yahoo.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-9894
Ole JungSection for Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. ol.jung@uke.de.
Ralf SmeetsSection for Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. r.smeets@uke.de.
Sanja StojanovicInstitute of Biology and Human Genetics, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, University of Niš, Faculty of Medicine, 18106 Niš, Serbia. s.sanja88@gmail.com.
Stevo NajmanInstitute of Biology and Human Genetics, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, University of Niš, Faculty of Medicine, 18106 Niš, Serbia. stevo.najman@gmail.com.
Kristina GlenskeClinic of Small Animals, c/o Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany. Kristina.Glenske@vetmed.uni-giessen.de.
Michael HahnDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. hahn@uke.de.
Sabine WenischClinic of Small Animals, c/o Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany. Sabine.Wenisch@vetmed.uni-giessen.de.
Reinhard SchnettlerUniversity Medical Center, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany. reiner.schnettler@mac.com.
Mike BarbeckSection for Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. mike.barbeck@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-1347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes is indicated for the treatment of large, non-self-containing bone defects, or multi-walled defects in the case of vertical augmentations. However, less is known about the molecular basis of the foreign body response to PTFE membranes. In the present study, the inflammatory tissue responses to a novel high-density PTFE (dPTFE) barrier membrane have preclinically been evaluated using the subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice by means of histopathological and histomorphometrical analysis methods and immunohistochemical detection of M1- and M2-macrophages. A collagen membrane was used as the control material. The results of the present study demonstrate that the tissue response to the dPTFE membrane involves inflammatory macrophages, but comparable cell numbers were also detected in the implant beds of the control collagen membrane, which is known to be biocompatible. Although these data indicate that the analyzed dPTFE membrane is not fully bioinert, but its biocompatibility is comparable to collagen-based membranes. Based on its optimal biocompatibility, the novel dPTFE barrier membrane may optimally support bone healing within the context of guided bone regeneration (GBR).

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedFemaleForeign-Body ReactionGuided Tissue RegenerationMacrophagesMembranes, ArtificialMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPolytetrafluoroethyleneTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsMembranes, ArtificialPolytetrafluoroethylenebiocompatibilitycollagen membraneinflammationM1M2macrophagePTFE membranetissue reaction

Identifiers

PMID30262765
PMCPMC6213856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.