Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30262690›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetics2018

A minimum requirements method to isolate large quantities of highly purified DNA from one drop of poultry blood.

Mohammed Baqur S Al-Shuhaib

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparing feed efficiency and egg production in Hy-Line W-80 and Iraqi indigenous chickens.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA Extraction with TRIzol Reagent Using a Silica Column.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed Baqur S Al-ShuhaibDepartment of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, Al-Qasim Green University, 8-Al Qasim, 51001 Babil, Iraq. mohammed79@agre.uoqasim.edu.iq, baquralhilly_79@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we describe a rapid, efficient and noncomplicated method for extracting poultry genomic DNA. This simple method obtains excellent qualities of molecular biology grade DNA in a matter of only about 15 min. A straightforward protocol is followed in this extraction procedure, in which, when the blood cells are placed in a distilled water alone, water rapidly disrupts red blood cells (RBCs) membranes and alleviate chickens' undesired high blood viscosity without being aided by any other chemicals. Moreover, the time, cost and efforts were hugely reduced since the step of leukocytes lysis was successfully mixed with the protein precipitation. The isolated genomic DNA, in terms of its quantity and quality, is satisfying and is proved to be suitable for restriction endonucleases digestion, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Thus, instead of extracting a limited amount of DNA using expensive or relatively expensive kits, this guaranteed procedure can be utilized alternatively to accurately extract genomic DNA (gDNA) from minimal starter quantities of the chicken's blood that do not exceed 50

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDNAErythrocytesGenomicsPoultryDNA

Identifiers

PMID30262690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.