Opioids and chronic pain in primary care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Exploring Pain Clinical Specialists' Perspectives on Opioid Optimization for Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in England.Journal of pain research · 2025
   Article
2. The Association between Dysbiosis and Neurological Conditions Often Manifesting with Chronic Pain.Biomedicines · 2023
   Review
3. Acceptability of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
   Article
4. Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as