Comment on "The plateau of human mortality: Demography of longevity pioneers".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Biological Restraints on Indefinite Survival.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
   Review
2. Why Gilgamesh failed: the mechanistic basis of the limits to human lifespan.Nature aging · 2022
   Review
3. Swiss Cohort & Biobank - The White Paper.Public health reviews · 2022
   Article
4. Regularities in human mortality after age 105.PloS one · 2021
   Article
5. Are We Approaching a Biological Limit to Human Longevity?The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
   Article
6. A universal transcriptomic signature of age reveals the temporal scaling of Caenorhabditis elegans aging trajectories.Scientific reports · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to Comment on "The plateau of human mortality: Demography of longevity pioneers".2018
• Comment on
  The plateau of human mortality: Demography of longevity pioneers.2018

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as