Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30262338›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2019

Self-generated Unconscious Processing of Loss Linked to Less Severe Grieving.

Noam Schneck, Tao Tu, George A Bonanno, M Katherine Shear, Paul Sajda, J John Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prolonged grief disorder in later life: advancing our understanding of biopsychosocial mechanisms to guide future personalized interventions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noam SchneckDivision of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York. Electronic address: schneck@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Tao TuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York.
George A BonannoDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York.
M Katherine ShearDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York; School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Paul SajdaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York; Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York.
J John MannDivision of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Funding

Research Training in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: From Animal Models to PatientsT32MH015144 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Eduardo David Leonardo · 1985 to 2026
$11.1M
Research Training in Late-Life NeuroPsychiatric DisordersT32MH020004 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Patrick J Brown · 1998 to 2026
$6.1M
Predicting complicated grief from grief processingK23MH114021 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SCHNECK, NOAM · 2018 to 2023
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH114021NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015144NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intense loss processing that characterizes grieving may help people to adapt to the loss. However, empirical studies show that more conscious loss-related thinking and greater reactivity to reminders of the deceased correspond to poorer adaptation. These findings raise the possibility that loss processing that is unconscious rather than conscious and is self-generated rather than reactive may facilitate adaptation. Here, we used machine learning to detect a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signature of self-generated unconscious loss processing that we hypothesized to correlate with lower grief severity.

methodsA total of 29 subjects bereaved within the past 14 months participated. Participants performed a modified Stroop fMRI task using deceased-related words. A machine-learning regression, trained on Stroop fMRI data, learned a neural pattern for deceased-related selective attention (d-SA), the allocation of attention to the deceased. Expression of this pattern was tracked during a subsequent sustained attention fMRI task interspersed with deceased-related thought probes (SART-PROBES). d-SA pattern expression during SART-PROBES blocks without reported thoughts of loss indicated self-generated unconscious loss processing. Grief severity was measured with the Inventory for Complicated Grief.

resultsd-SA expression during SART-PROBES blocks without conscious deceased-related thinking correlated negatively with Inventory for Complicated Grief score (r

conclusionsSelf-generated unconscious loss processing correlated with reduced grief severity. This activity, supported by a cognitive social neural architecture, may advance adaptation to the loss.

Indexed as

GriefUnconscious, PsychologyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysStroop TestDorsolateral prefrontal cortexGrievingMachine learningMind wanderingTemporal parietal junctionUnconscious

Identifiers

PMID30262338
PMCPMC6389441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.