ArticleBJPsych bulletin2019
Barriers to using clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: systematic review.
Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clozapine prescribing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia - an updated systematic literature review of barriers and facilitators among clinicians.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Competence and confidence of health care professionals in using clozapine: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge domain and trends in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) research based on CiteSpace bibliometrics analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Ethnic disparities in clozapine prescription for service-users with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review.Psychological medicine · 2022Pooled it
- A Guideline and Checklist for Initiating and Managing Clozapine Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2022Guideline
- Neuropsychological differences between treatment-resistant and treatment-responsive schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Clozapine prescribing barriers in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review.Medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Tele-mentoring Program to Increase Clozapine Utilization.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Trial
- Clozapine and Solid Cancer Risk in Lithuania: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Translating Evidence for Early Intervention in Psychosis (TRANSLATE): Protocol for Evaluating the Implementation of Early Intervention in Psychosis in Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs).Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Implementing Point-of-Care Fingerstick Testing for Clozapine Safety Monitoring in Outpatient Psychiatry: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- When Doing Nothing Feels Safer: A Multilevel Framework for Therapeutic Inertia in Psychiatry.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Late-Onset Neutropenia in Clozapine Users: Unrelated or Drug-Induced? A Case-Registry Analysis of Incidence, Characteristics, and Rechallenge Attempts.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Clozapine-induced Myocarditis in Korea: Analysis of a Nationwide Database and Comparison to Other Countries.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Underprescription of Clozapine: A Narrative Review Regarding 'Clozaphobia'.Human psychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Identifying Clinical Characteristics of Young People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Undergoing Community Initiation of Clozapine.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Global trends in clozapine utilisation between 2014 and 2024: a longitudinal epidemiological study with data from 75 countries.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Evaluation of clozapine forgiveness under imperfect adherence scenarios: a population pharmacokinetic simulation study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Proportion and Reasons for Clozapine Discontinuation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Review
- Adult psychiatrists' views on clozapine prescribing for schizophrenia in Germany-an online survey.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Article
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and methodTo systematically review the literature on barriers to the use of clozapine and identify any interventions for optimizing clozapine use in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Journal databases were searched from 1972 to March 2018. The following search terms were used: treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine, barriers, use, prescription rates, implementation, clozaril and prescribing practices. Following a review of the literature, 15 papers were included in the review.
resultsThe major barriers that were identified included mandatory blood testing, fear of serious side-effects and lack of adherence by the patients, difficulty in identifying suitable patients, service fragmentation, and inadequate training in or exposure to using clozapine.Clinical implicationsIn view of consistent evidence across the studies on inadequate knowledge and skills as a significant barrier, we suggest that a certification requiring competence in initiating and managing side-effects of clozapine becomes a mandatory requirement in training programmes.Declarations of interestNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.