Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261927›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2018

Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review.

Wendy A Gifford, Janet E Squires, Douglas E Angus, Lisa A Ashley, Lucie Brosseau, Janet M Craik, Marie-Cécile Domecq, Mary Egan, Paul Holyoke, Linda Juergensen and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to improve cancer survivorship among Indigenous Peoples and communities: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Healthy Promotion for Fighting Metabolic Syndrome: Insights from Multi-Center HeRO-FiT Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wendy A GiffordFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. wgifford@uottawa.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0841-3219
Janet E SquiresFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas E AngusTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa A AshleyCanadian Nurses Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lucie BrosseauFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Janet M CraikCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Marie-Cécile DomecqHealth Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mary EganFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Paul HolyokeSE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Linda JuergensenFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lars WallinSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Liquaa WazniFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ian D GrahamSahlgrenska Academy, Department of Health Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

CIHR 132036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeadership by point-of-care and senior managers is increasingly recognized as critical to the acceptance and use of research evidence in practice. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the leadership behaviours of managers that are associated with research use by clinical staff in nursing and allied health professionals.

methodsA mixed methods systematic review was performed. Eight electronic bibliographic databases were searched. Studies examining the association between leadership behaviours and nurses and allied health professionals' use of research were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if leadership could not be clearly attributed to someone in a management position. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, extracted data and performed quality assessments. Narrative synthesis was conducted.

resultsThe search yielded 7019 unique titles and abstracts after duplicates were removed. Three hundred five full-text articles were reviewed, and 31 studies reported in 34 articles were included. Methods used were qualitative (n = 19), cross-sectional survey (n = 9), and mixed methods (n = 3). All studies included nurses, and six also included allied health professionals. Twelve leadership behaviours were extracted from the data for point-of-care managers and ten for senior managers. Findings indicated that managers performed a diverse range of leadership behaviours that encompassed change-oriented, relation-oriented and task-oriented behaviours. The most commonly described behavior was support for the change, which involved demonstrating conceptual and operational commitment to research-based practices.

conclusionsThis systematic review adds to the growing body of evidence that indicates that manager-staff dyads are influential in translating research evidence into action. Findings also reveal that leadership for research use involves change and task-oriented behaviours that influence the environmental milieu and the organisational infrastructure that supports clinical care. While findings explain how managers enact leadership for research use, we now require robust methodological studies to determine which behaviours are effective in enabling research use with nurses and allied health professionals for high-quality evidence-based care.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42014007660.

Indexed as

LeadershipOrganizational CultureAllied Health PersonnelAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImplementation ScienceInformation DisseminationNursingNursing ResearchResearchAdministratorsAllied healthEvidence-based practiceLeadershipManagersNursingResearch use

Identifiers

PMID30261927
PMCPMC6161344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.