Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261646›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Wrist-Based Accelerometer Cut-Points to Identify Sedentary Time in 5⁻11-Year-Old Children.

Jessica Chandler, Michael Beets, Pedro Saint-Maurice, Robert Weaver, Dylan Cliff, Clemens Drenowatz, Justin B Moore, Mei Sui, Keith Brazendale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica ChandlerCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. chandlje@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-212X
Michael BeetsDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. beets@mailbox.sc.edu.
Pedro Saint-MauriceDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NIH), Rockville, MD 20850, USA. pedro.saintmaurice@nih.gov.
Robert WeaverDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. weaverrg@mailbox.sc.edu.
Dylan CliffSchool of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. dylanc@uow.edu.au.
Clemens DrenowatzDepartment of Teacher Education Pädagogische Hochschule Oberösterreich, 4020 Linz, Austria. clemens.drenowatz@ph-ooe.at.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-5364
Justin B MooreDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA. jusmoore@wakehealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-0538
Mei SuiDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. msui@mailbox.sc.edu.
Keith BrazendaleDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. brazendk@email.sc.edu.
University of South Carolina · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Education Upper Austria · ATUniversity of Wollongong · AUWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this paper is to derive a wrist-placed cut-point threshold for distinguishing sedentary behaviors from light-intensity walking using the ActiGraph GT3X+ in children.

methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional study design, typically used in measurement-related studies. A sample of 167 children, ages 5⁻11 years (mean ± SD: 8.0 ± 1.8 years), performed up to eight seated sedentary activities while wearing accelerometers on both wrists. Activities included: reading books, sorting cards, cutting and pasting, playing board games, eating snacks, playing with tablets, watching TV, and writing. Direct observation verified sedentary behavior from light activity. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine optimal cut-point thresholds. Quantile regression models estimated differences between dominant and non-dominant placement.

resultsThe optimal cut-point threshold for the non-dominant wrist was 203 counts/5 s with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 71.56, 70.83, and 0.72, respectively. A 10-fold cross-validation revealed an average AUC of 0.70. Statistically significant (

conclusionResults from this study support the recommendation to place accelerometers on the non-dominant wrist to minimize "noise" during seated sedentary behaviors.

Indexed as

cut-pointsmeasurementphysical activitysedentary behaviorwearablesyouth

Identifiers

PMID30261646
PMCPMC6210293
OpenAlexW2893706655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.