Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261422›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2018

Using a novel rapid viral test to improve triage of emergency department patients with acute respiratory illness during flu season.

Courtney J Pedersen, Daniel T Rogan, Samuel Yang, James V Quinn

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Point of care testing for infectious disease: ownership and quality.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney J PedersenStanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, 291 Campus Dr, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: courtney.pedersen@stanford.edu.
Daniel T RoganDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Alway Building, M023, 300 Pasteur Drive - MC: 5768, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: dtrogan@stanford.edu.
Samuel YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Alway Building, M023, 300 Pasteur Drive - MC: 5768, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: syang5@stanford.edu.
James V QuinnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Alway Building, M023, 300 Pasteur Drive - MC: 5768, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: quinnj@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute respiratory illnesses (ARI) are mostly viral in etiology and cause significant morbidity and mortality. Point of care PCR (POC-PCR) is a promising new technology for rapid virus identification but utility in the Emergency Department (ED) is not yet defined.

objectivesPrimarily, to investigate the value of POC-PCR in rapidly identifying RSV and influenza in the setting of ED triage. Additionally, to assess whether rapid knowledge of accurate test results would improve patient management by preventing nosocomial transmission and optimizing the prescription of antimicrobials for ARIs. STUDY

designA prospective cohort study of consecutive ED patients with ARI symptoms during peak flu season was conducted. Patient nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested using a POC-PCR device; physicians and patients were blinded to results. Virus positive and negative groups were compared by ED patient room placement and antimicrobial therapy ordered. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated using laboratory-PCR as the gold standard.

resultsOf 119 participants, 52.9% were POC-PCR positive - Influenza A (42.9%), RSV (41.3%), influenza B (15.9%). Nearly 70% of virus positive patients were placed rooms shared with non-ARI patients. Antibiotics were prescribed for 27.3% of virus positive patients, and 77.8% of oseltamivir-eligible patients did not receive therapy. POC-PCR was 100% sensitive (95% CI, 80.5-100.0%) and 95.2% specific (95% CI, 76.2-99.9%).

conclusionsRapid POC-PCR for influenza and RSV in ED triage has excellent sensitivity and specificity and the potential to improve social distancing practices through better triage and increase appropriate prescription of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseEmergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfluenza A virusMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesARIInfluenzaPoint of careRapid testRSV

Identifiers

PMID30261422
PMCPMC7106347
OpenAlexW2892079323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.