Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261360›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Insight and emotion regulation in schizophrenia: A brain activation and functional connectivity study.

Daouia I Larabi, Lisette van der Meer, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg, Branislava Ćurčić-Blake, André Aleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daouia I LarabiUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Center, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.i.larabi@umcg.nl.
Lisette van der MeerLentis Psychiatric Institute, Department of Rehabilitation, Zuidlaren, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Groningen, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gerdina H M PijnenborgUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Groningen, The Netherlands; GGZ Drenthe, Department of Psychotic Disorders, Assen, The Netherlands.
Branislava Ćurčić-BlakeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
André AlemanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Center, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsight is impaired in the majority of schizophrenia patients. The exact neural correlates of impaired insight remain unclear. We assume that the ability to regulate emotions contributes to having good clinical insight, as patients should be able to regulate their emotional state in such a way that they can adapt adequately in order to cope with impaired functioning and negative stigma associated with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Numerous studies have shown emotional dysregulation in schizophrenia. We investigated the association between insight and brain activation and connectivity during emotion regulation.

methodsBrain activation during emotion regulation was measured with functional MRI in 30 individuals with schizophrenia. Two emotion regulation strategies were examined: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Clinical insight was measured with the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight - Expanded, and cognitive insight was measured with the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Whole brain random effects multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relation between brain activation during emotion regulation and insight. Generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) was used to investigate the relation between task-related connectivity and insight.

resultsNo significant associations were found between insight and neural correlates of cognitive reappraisal. For clinical insight and suppression, significant positive associations were found between symptom relabeling and activation in the left striatum, thalamus and insula, right insula and caudate, right pre- and postcentral gyrus, left superior occipital gyrus and cuneus and right middle and superior occipital gyrus and cuneus. Furthermore, reduced clinical insight was associated with more connectivity between midline medial frontal gyrus and right middle occipital gyrus. For cognitive insight and suppression, significant positive associations were found between self-reflectiveness and activation in pre- and postcentral gyrus and left middle cingulate gyrus.

conclusionsOur results suggest an association between the capacity to relabel symptoms and activation of brain systems involved in cognitive-emotional control and visual processing of negative stimuli. Furthermore, poorer self-reflectiveness may be associated with brain systems subserving control and execution.

Indexed as

EmotionsSchizophrenic PsychologySelf-ControlAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysSchizophreniaYoung AdultCognitive reappraisalEmotion regulationExpressive suppressionfMRIgPPIInsight

Identifiers

PMID30261360
PMCPMC6154769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.