Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Inactivation of human and avian influenza viruses by potassium oleate of natural soap component through exothermic interaction.

Takayoshi Kawahara, Isamu Akiba, Megumi Sakou, Takemasa Sakaguchi, Hatsumi Taniguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Traditional Kampo Drugs and Their Constituent Crude Drugs on Influenza Virus ReplicationEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takayoshi KawaharaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-3598
Isamu AkibaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Megumi SakouDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takemasa SakaguchiDepartment of Virology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hatsumi TaniguchiDepartment of Microbiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
The University of Kitakyushu · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An influenza epidemic is still a problem despite the development of vaccines and anti-influenza drugs. Preventive measures such as handwashing are fundamental and important for counteracting influenza virus infection. In this study, we clarified the anti-influenza virus effects of surfactants, which are the main components of hand soaps for hand washing: potassium oleate (C18:1), sodium laureth sulfate (LES) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS). For a human influenza virus strain (H3N2), C18:1 reduced the infectivity by 4 logs or more, whereas LES and SDS reduced the infectivity by 1 log or less. Similar results were obtained when an avian influenza virus strain (H5N3) was used. The interaction between the surfactant and virus was then investigated by isothermal titration calorimetry. The LES-virus system showed a positive value of enthalpy changes (ΔH), meaning an exothermic interaction that indicated a hydrophobic interaction. In contrast, both the C18:1-virus system and the SDS-virus system showed negative values of ΔH, meaning an endothermic interaction that indicated an electrical interaction. The ΔH value of the C18:1-virus system was much higher than that of the SDS-virus system. A mixture of C18:1 and HA proteins similarly showed negative values of ΔH. These results indicate that influenza virus inactivation by a hydrophobic interaction of a surfactant with the viral envelope is insufficient to prevent infection, whereas inactivation by an electrical interaction of a surfactant with HA proteins is sufficient to prevent influenza virus infection.

Indexed as

Virus InactivationAnimalsChick EmbryoChickensDogsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H5N8 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsOleic AcidSoapsSodium Dodecyl SulfateOleic AcidSoapsSodium Dodecyl Sulfatesodium laureth sulfate

Identifiers

PMID30261071
PMCPMC6160177
OpenAlexW2892904178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.