Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30261021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

High functional conservation of takeout family members in a courtship model system.

Sumit Saurabh, Nancy Vanaphan, Walter Wen, Brigitte Dauwalder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sumit SaurabhDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Nancy VanaphanDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Walter WenDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Brigitte DauwalderDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-6090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

takeout (to) is one of the male-specific genes expressed in the fat body that regulate male courtship behavior, and has been shown to act as a secreted protein in conjunction with courtship circuits. There are 23 takeout family members in Drosophila melanogaster, and homologues of this family are distributed across insect species. Sequence conservation among family members is low. Here we test the functional conservation of takeout family members by examining whether they can rescue the takeout courtship defect. We find that despite their sequence divergence takeout members from Aedes aegypti and Epiphas postvittana, as well as family members from D. melanogaster can substitute for takeout in courtship, demonstrating their functional conservation. Making use of the known E. postvittana Takeout structure, we used homology modeling and amphipathic helix analysis and found high overall structural conservation, including high conservation of the structure and amphipathic lining of an internal cavity that has been shown to accommodate hydrophobic ligands. Together these data suggest a high degree of structural conservation that likely underlies functional conservation in courtship. In addition, we have identified a role for a conserved exposed protein motif important for the protein's role in courtship.

Indexed as

AedesAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsConserved SequenceCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenetic Complementation TestInsect ProteinsMaleModels, MolecularMothsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPhylogenyProtein ConformationDrosophila ProteinsInsect ProteinsTO protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID30261021
PMCPMC6160090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.