Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30260948›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Multiple origins and modularity in the spatiotemporal emergence of cerebellar astrocyte heterogeneity.

Valentina Cerrato, Elena Parmigiani, María Figueres-Oñate, Marion Betizeau, Jessica Aprato, Ishira Nanavaty, Paola Berchialla, Federico Luzzati, Claudio de'Sperati, Laura López-Mascaraque and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. StarTrack: Mapping Cellular Fates with Inheritable Color Codes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell Fate of Retinal Progenitor Cells: In Ovo UbC-StarTrack Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentina CerratoDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi-Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elena ParmigianiDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi-Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
María Figueres-OñateDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Neurobiology, Cajal Institute -CSIC-, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain.
Marion BetizeauBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich Irchel, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jessica ApratoDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi-Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ishira NanavatyDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi-Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola BerchiallaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Federico LuzzatiNeuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Claudio de'SperatiLaboratory of Action, Perception and Cognition, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Laura López-MascaraqueDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Neurobiology, Cajal Institute -CSIC-, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain.
Annalisa BuffoDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi-Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7637-0006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The morphological, molecular, and functional heterogeneity of astrocytes is under intense scrutiny, but how this diversity is ontogenetically achieved remains largely unknown. Here, by quantitative in vivo clonal analyses and proliferation studies, we demonstrate that the major cerebellar astrocyte types emerge according to an unprecedented and remarkably orderly developmental program comprising (i) a time-dependent decline in both clone size and progenitor multipotency, associated with clone allocation first to the hemispheres and then to the vermis(ii) distinctive clonal relationships among astrocyte types, revealing diverse lineage potentials of embryonic and postnatal progenitors; and (iii) stereotyped clone architectures and recurrent modularities that correlate to layer-specific dynamics of postnatal proliferation/differentiation. In silico simulations indicate that the sole presence of a unique multipotent progenitor at the source of the whole astrogliogenic program is unlikely and rather suggest the involvement of additional committed components.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAstrocytesCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationCell SizeCerebellumClone CellsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID30260948
PMCPMC6178385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.