Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30260471›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

Measuring Constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research in the Context of Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Center.

Michelle C Kegler, Shuting Liang, Bryan J Weiner, Shin Ping Tu, Daniela B Friedman, Beth A Glenn, Alison K Herrmann, Betsy Risendal, Maria E Fernandez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Implementation of an Evidence-Based Intervention with Safety Net Clinics to Improve Mammography Appointment Adherence Among Underserved Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Trial
  4. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle C KeglerDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-4898-5454
Shuting LiangDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Bryan J WeinerDepartments of Global Health and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Shin Ping TuGeneral Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Daniela B FriedmanDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior and the Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Beth A GlennUCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Fielding School of Public Health & Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Alison K HerrmannUCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Fielding School of Public Health & Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Betsy RisendalDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.
Maria E FernandezSchool of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Emory University · USKaiser Permanente · USColorado School of Public Health · USSouth Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWashington Department of Social and Health Services · US

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001911 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AU, DAVID H, HARRIS, JEFFREY RANDALL · 2009 to 2013
$14.3M
HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERS - CENTER CATEGORY 1U48DP001949 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TORTOLERO, SUSAN · 2009 to 2013
$7.9M
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001938 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER/HSC DENVER · PI MARSHALL, JULIE A · 2009 to 2013
$7.5M
HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERS: CENTER PROPOSAL CAT. 1U48DP001936 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
UCLA/RAND PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001934 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BASTANI, ROSHAN · 2009 to 2013
$5.9M
ACL HHS U48DP001944ACL HHS U48DP005000National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network U48DP0010909NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001911NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001934NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001936NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001938NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo operationalize constructs from each of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains and to present psychometric properties within the context of evidence-based approaches for promoting colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

methodsData were collected from FQHC clinics across seven states. A web-based Staff Survey and a Clinic Characteristics Survey were completed by staff and leaders (n = 277) from 59 FQHCs.

resultsInternal reliability of scales was adequate ranging from 0.62 for compatibility to 0.88 for other personal attributes (openness). Intraclass correlations for the scales indicated that 2.4 percent to 20.9 percent of the variance in scale scores occurs within clinics. Discriminant validity was adequate at the clinic level, with all correlations less than 0.75. Convergent validity was more difficult to assess given lack of hypothesized associations between factors expected to predict implementation.

conclusionsOur results move the field forward by describing initial psychometric properties of constructs across CFIR domains.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPrimary Health CareResearch DesignAdultColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Services ResearchHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSafety-net ProvidersSurveys and QuestionnairescancerImplementation scienceorganizational theoryprimary caresafety net providers

Identifiers

PMID30260471
PMCPMC6232399
OpenAlexW2890112664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.