Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30260269›Full record

Observational studyJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2019

Laxative co-medication and changes in defecation patterns during opioid use.

Frans de Bruin, Karin Hek, Jan van Lieshout, Monique Verduijn, Pim Langendijk, Marcel Bouvy, Martina Teichert

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Frans de Bruin1 Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karin Hek2 Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan van Lieshout3 Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique Verduijn4 Department of Guideline Development and Research, Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pim Langendijk5 Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Reinier de Graaf Group Hospitals, Delft, The Netherlands.
Marcel Bouvy1 Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martina Teichert3 Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-3325
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUtrecht University · NLDutch College of General Practitioners · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid-induced constipation is a clinically relevant side effect and a cause of potentially avoidable drug-related hospital admissions.

objectivesTo describe the presence of laxative co-medication, the reasons for not starting laxatives and to evaluate changes in stool patterns of opioid initiators.

methodsIn this observational study community pharmacists evaluated the availability of laxative co-medication in starting opioid users and registered reasons for non-use. Two opioid initiators per pharmacy were invited to complete questionnaires ('Bristol stool form scale' and 'Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire for the Adult Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders') on their defecation prior to and during opioid use. Descriptive statistics and Chi square tests were used to analyse reasons for non-use of laxatives and changes in defecation patterns.

resultsEighty-one pharmacists collected data from 460 opioid initiators. Of those, 344 (74.8%) used laxatives concomitantly. Main reason not to use laxatives was that either prescribers or patients did not consider them necessary. Sixty-seven (89.3%) of the 75 opioid starters with two questionnaires completed were not constipated at opioid start. Eleven of them (16%) developed constipation during opioid use (Chi square p=0.003). At follow-up within laxative users 10.6% were constipated compared to 20.7% in subjects without laxatives.

conclusionOne in four opioid starters did not dispose of laxative co-medication, mainly because they were not considered necessary by either the prescriber or the patient. The prevalence of constipation doubled during opioid use. A watchful waiting strategy for the use of laxative co-medication might include a monitoring of defecation patterns with validated questionnaires.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationDefecationFemaleHumansLaxativesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidLaxativeslaxativesopioid-induced constipationOpioids

Identifiers

PMID30260269
PMCPMC6716205
OpenAlexW2892954752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.