Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30260087›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions2018

Impulsivity and decision making in older and younger cocaine-dependent participants: A preliminary study.

Sade E Johns, Qin Wang, Lisa K Straub, F Gerard Moeller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sade E JohnsInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-6044
Qin WangInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Lisa K StraubInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
F Gerard MoellerInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Preclinical Assessment of Compounds for Cocaine Use Disorder (CocUD)U54DA038999 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2014 to 2018
$6.8M
NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA038999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSubstance misuse is increasing in the older population, which may have differing effects on behavior compared to younger substance participants. Differences in trait and state impulsivity were assessed in younger and older cocaine-dependent participants.

methodsThirty-one younger cocaine-dependent participants (n = 31) and 21 older cocaine-dependent participants (n = 21) were assessed using the Barrett Impulsiveness Scale-11 and the Immediate Memory Task.

resultsYounger participants showed higher trait impulsivity than older participants (p =.027). However, older participants demonstrated higher state impulsivity than younger participants (p =.018).

conclusionHigher state impulsivity in older cocaine participants suggests that cocaine use may have accelerating effects on the aging brain. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This preliminary study adds the limited research on how cocaine use affects normal aging. Current treatments are based on younger adults, therefore the needs of older adults should be taken into consideration and studied more. (Am J Addict 2018;27:557-559).

Indexed as

AgingAdultAge FactorsCocaine-Related DisordersDecision MakingFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30260087
PMCPMC6211586
OpenAlexW2894407252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.