Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259989›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019

CA19-9 and apolipoprotein-A2 isoforms as detection markers for pancreatic cancer: a prospective evaluation.

Kazufumi Honda, Verena A Katzke, Anika Hüsing, Shinobu Okaya, Hirokazu Shoji, Kaoru Onidani, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, Elisabete Weiderpass and 32 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Utility of the Apolipoprotein A2 Isoform Index as a Tumor Marker for Pancreatic Cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnostic Performance of a Tumor Marker Gene Test to Personalize Serum CA19-9 Reference Ranges.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Kazufumi HondaDepartment of Biomarker for Early Detection of Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Verena A KatzkeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Anika HüsingDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Shinobu OkayaDepartment of Biomarker for Early Detection of Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu ShojiDepartment of Biomarker for Early Detection of Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaoru OnidaniDepartment of Biomarker for Early Detection of Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Anja OlsenDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne TjønnelandDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim OvervadDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Elisabete WeiderpassDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Paolo VineisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David MullerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kostas TsilidisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Domenico PalliCancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute - ISPO, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-2437
Valeria PalaEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Rosario TuminoCancer Registry and Histopathology Unit, "Civic - M.P. Arezzo" Hospital, Ragusa, Italy.
Alessio NaccaratiDepartment of Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, IIGM - Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, Torino, Italy.
Salvatore PanicoDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Krasimira AleksandrovaDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany.
Heiner BoeingDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany.
H Bas Bueno-de-MesquitaDepartment of Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Petra H PeetersDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonia TrichopoulouUnit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health.
Pagona LagiouDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kay-Tee KhawCancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nick WarehamMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ruth C TravisCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Susana MerinoPublic Health Directorate, Asturias, Spain, Acknowledgment of funds: Regional Government of Asturias.
Eric J DuellPanC4 Consortium, Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5256-0163
Miguel Rodríguez-BarrancoEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
María Dolores ChirlaqueDepartment of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain, Ronda de Levante, Murcia, Spain.
Aurelio BarricarteCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
Vinciane ReboursPancreatology Unit, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Marie-Chiristine Boutron-RuaultCESP, INSERM U1018, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Francesca Romana ManciniINSERM - UMR 1149, University Paris 7, Paris, France.
Paul BrennanSection of Genetics, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Ghislaine SceloSection of Genetics, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Jonas ManjerDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malin SundDepartment of Surgical and Preoperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Daniel ÖhlundDepartment of Radiation Sciences and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Federico CanzianGenomic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-4583
Rudolf KaaksDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3751-3929
German Cancer Research Center · DEInserm · FRCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRDanish Cancer Society · DKGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEImperial College London · GBNational Cancer Research Institute · GBUmeå University · SEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBAarhus University · DKAzienda Usl 8 Arezzo · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGovernment of Spain · ESHarvard University · USInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra · ESItalian institute for Genomic Medicine · ITJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development · JP

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14136Cancer Research UK 16491Cancer Research UK A16491Medical Research Council G0401527Medical Research Council G1000143Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Medical Research Council MR/M012190/1Medical Research Council MR/N003284/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, we identified unique processing patterns of apolipoprotein A2 (ApoA2) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our study provides a first prospective evaluation of an ApoA2 isoform ("ApoA2-ATQ/AT"), alone and in combination with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), as an early detection biomarker for pancreatic cancer. We performed ELISA measurements of CA19-9 and ApoA2-ATQ/AT in 156 patients with pancreatic cancer and 217 matched controls within the European EPIC cohort, using plasma samples collected up to 60 months prior to diagnosis. The detection discrimination statistics were calculated for risk scores by strata of lag-time. For CA19-9, in univariate marker analyses, C-statistics to distinguish future pancreatic cancer patients from cancer-free individuals were 0.80 for plasma taken ≤6 months before diagnosis, and 0.71 for >6-18 months; for ApoA2-ATQ/AT, C-statistics were 0.62, and 0.65, respectively. Joint models based on ApoA2-ATQ/AT plus CA19-9 significantly improved discrimination within >6-18 months (C = 0.74 vs. 0.71 for CA19-9 alone, p = 0.022) and ≤ 18 months (C = 0.75 vs. 0.74, p = 0.022). At 98% specificity, and for lag times of ≤6, >6-18 or ≤ 18 months, sensitivities were 57%, 36% and 43% for CA19-9 combined with ApoA2-ATQ/AT, respectively, vs. 50%, 29% and 36% for CA19-9 alone. Compared to CA19-9 alone, the combination of CA19-9 and ApoA2-ATQ/AT may improve detection of pancreatic cancer up to 18 months prior to diagnosis under usual care, and may provide a useful first measure for pancreatic cancer detection prior to imaging.

Indexed as

AdultAgedApolipoprotein A-IICA-19-9 AntigenCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProtein IsoformsAPOA2 protein, humanApolipoprotein A-IICA-19-9 AntigenProtein Isoformsapolipoprotein A2CA19-9early detectionisoformspancreatic cancerprospective study

Identifiers

PMID30259989
PMCPMC6760974
OpenAlexW2893101140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.