ArticleMolecular omics2018
Robust determination of differential abundance in shotgun proteomics using nonparametric statistics.
Article in Molecular omics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Label-free shotgun mass spectrometry enables the detection of significant changes in protein abundance between different conditions. Due to often limited cohort sizes or replication, large ratios of potential protein markers to number of samples, as well as multiple null measurements pose important technical challenges to conventional parametric models. From a statistical perspective, a scenario similar to that of unlabeled proteomics is encountered in genomics when looking for differentially expressed genes. Still, the difficulty of detecting a large fraction of the true positives without a high false discovery rate is arguably greater in proteomics due to even smaller sample sizes and peptide-to-peptide variability in detectability. These constraints argue for nonparametric (or distribution-free) tests on normalized peptide values, thus minimizing the number of free parameters, as well as for measuring significance with permutation testing. We propose such a procedure with a class-based statistic, no parametric assumptions, and no parameters to select other than a nominal false discovery rate. Our method was tested on a new dataset which is available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD006447. The dataset was prepared using a standard proteolytic digest of a human protein mixture at 1.5-fold to 3-fold protein concentration changes and diluted into a constant background of yeast proteins. We demonstrate its superiority relative to other approaches in terms of the realized sensitivity and realized false discovery rates determined by ground truth, and recommend it for detecting differentially abundant proteins from MS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.