Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259769›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2018

Hematoma block for distal radius fractures - prospective, randomized comparison of two different volumes of lidocaine.

Hagay Orbach, Nimrod Rozen, Barak Rinat, Guy Rubin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does the addition of peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia during distal radius fracture reduction? A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Trial
  2. Comparative Efficacy of Hematoma Block Versus Circumferential Block in Pain Management for Distal Radius Fracture Reduction.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Trial
  3. Circumferential periosteal block versus hematoma block for the reduction of distal radius and ulna fractures: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hagay Orbach1 Orthopedic Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Nimrod Rozen1 Orthopedic Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Barak Rinat1 Orthopedic Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Guy Rubin1 Orthopedic Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Emek Medical Center · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different volumes of lidocaine injected into a fracture hematoma (hematoma block [HB]) for reducing distal radius fractures.

methodsPatients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients in whom 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected into the fracture site and group B included patients in whom 20 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected. The fracture was manipulated after 15 minutes and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was recorded during manipulation. Patients were followed up for approximately 1 hour and complications were recorded.

resultsTwenty patients were enrolled in the study (12 women and eight men), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32-87 years). Demographic findings were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score of group A was 5.50 ± 3.57 and that in group B was 3.09 ± 2.33, with no significant difference between the groups.

conclusionVAS scores between HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine are not significantly different. However, our study suggests that HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine has a better analgesic effect than HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHematomaHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRadius FracturesLidocaineanalgesiaanesthesiaDistal radius fracturehematoma blocklidocaineVisual Analogue Scale

Identifiers

PMID30259769
PMCPMC6259414
OpenAlexW2892405777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.