Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259343›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019

Consensus paper: Decoding the Contributions of the Cerebellum as a Time Machine. From Neurons to Clinical Applications.

Martin Bareš, Richard Apps, Laura Avanzino, Assaf Breska, Egidio D'Angelo, Pavel Filip, Marcus Gerwig, Richard B Ivry, Charlotte L Lawrenson, Elan D Louis and 5 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neural Representation of Episodic Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Dual-Task Interference Increases Variability in Sub-Second Repetitive Motor Timing.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Rigidity in Parkinson's Disease: The Objective Effect of Levodopa.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Ageing.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Martin BarešFirst Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. bares@muni.cz.
Richard AppsSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Laura AvanzinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Centro Polifunzionale di Scienze Motorie, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Assaf BreskaDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Egidio D'AngeloNeurophysiology Unit, Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Pavel FilipFirst Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcus GerwigDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Charlotte L LawrensonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Elan D LouisDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nicholas A LuskDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mario MantoDepartment of Neurology, CHU-Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium -Service des Neurosciences, UMons, Mons, Belgium.
Warren H MeckDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Hiroshi MitomaMedical Education Promotion Center, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Elijah A PetterDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time perception is an essential element of conscious and subconscious experience, coordinating our perception and interaction with the surrounding environment. In recent years, major technological advances in the field of neuroscience have helped foster new insights into the processing of temporal information, including extending our knowledge of the role of the cerebellum as one of the key nodes in the brain for this function. This consensus paper provides a state-of-the-art picture from the experts in the field of the cerebellar research on a variety of crucial issues related to temporal processing, drawing on recent anatomical, neurophysiological, behavioral, and clinical research.The cerebellar granular layer appears especially well-suited for timing operations required to confer millisecond precision for cerebellar computations. This may be most evident in the manner the cerebellum controls the duration of the timing of agonist-antagonist EMG bursts associated with fast goal-directed voluntary movements. In concert with adaptive processes, interactions within the cerebellar cortex are sufficient to support sub-second timing. However, supra-second timing seems to require cortical and basal ganglia networks, perhaps operating in concert with cerebellum. Additionally, sensory information such as an unexpected stimulus can be forwarded to the cerebellum via the climbing fiber system, providing a temporally constrained mechanism to adjust ongoing behavior and modify future processing. Patients with cerebellar disorders exhibit impairments on a range of tasks that require precise timing, and recent evidence suggest that timing problems observed in other neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia may reflect disrupted interactions between the basal ganglia and cerebellum.The complex concepts emerging from this consensus paper should provide a foundation for further discussion, helping identify basic research questions required to understand how the brain represents and utilizes time, as well as delineating ways in which this knowledge can help improve the lives of those with neurological conditions that disrupt this most elemental sense. The panel of experts agrees that timing control in the brain is a complex concept in whom cerebellar circuitry is deeply involved. The concept of a timing machine has now expanded to clinical disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumHumansNeuronsTime PerceptionCerebellumClimbing fiberConsensusMovementTemporal processingTiming

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.