Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259341›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2018

Botulinum Toxin as a Treatment for Refractory Gastroparesis: a Literature Review.

Ashley Thomas, Bruno de Souza Ribeiro, Miguel Malespin, Silvio W de Melo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxin.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Pharmacologic treatments for gastroparesis.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gastroparesis.Gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  8. Management of Gastroparesis.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Diabetic Gastroparesis: Perspectives From a Patient and Health Care Providers.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley ThomasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Bruno de Souza RibeiroDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 4555 Emerson Street, Suite 300, Jacksonville, FL, 32207, USA.
Miguel MalespinDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 4555 Emerson Street, Suite 300, Jacksonville, FL, 32207, USA.
Silvio W de MeloDivision of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. demelo@ohsu.edu.
Florida College · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGastroparesis (GP) is a disorder of gastrointestinal motility which leads to delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Treatment is limited as many patients are refractory to dietary modification and the use prokinetic medications carry significant adverse risks. These limitations necessitate more research into experimental therapies. The purpose of this article is to summarize the known information and guidelines on the diagnosis and management of GP and to review the latest literature on experimental treatments. RECENT

findingsBased on the current available literature, there is conflicting data regarding the efficacy of intra-pyloric botulinum injections (IPBIs) for refractory gastroparesis. There have been many open-label trials showing good clinical response, but the only two randomized controlled trials on the matter showed no objective improvement gastric emptying studies. However, both studies were likely underpowered and changes in gastric emptying may not correlate with symptom improvement. As such, these discouraging findings should not be used to exclude botox from the armamentarium of therapies for refractory GP. More large-scale, double-blinded, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to further validate the long-term efficacy and safety of IPBI, as well as gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), as compared to gastric electrical stimulation (GES) or surgical intervention (i.e., laparoscopic pylorotomy) for refractory gastroparesis.

Indexed as

Botulinum toxinGastroparesisNausea and vomiting

Identifiers

PMID30259341
OpenAlexW2894083132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.