Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259194›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018

The Utility of Rodent Models of Stress for Disentangling Individual Vulnerability to Depression and Cardiovascular Comorbidity.

Luca Carnevali, Rosario Statello, Andrea Sgoifo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca CarnevaliDepartment of Chemistry, Stress Physiology Lab, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 11/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Rosario StatelloDepartment of Chemistry, Stress Physiology Lab, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 11/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Andrea SgoifoDepartment of Chemistry, Stress Physiology Lab, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 11/A, 43124, Parma, Italy. andrea.sgoifo@unipr.it.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review offers a perspective of the utility of rodent models of stress for identifying sources of individual vulnerability to depression and cardiovascular disease comorbidity. RECENT

findingsDifferential stress susceptibility is found in rodents exposed to repeated social defeat as a function of their coping style. Specifically, passive coping rodents show an increase in inflammatory processes within the brain that favour the development of depressive-like symptoms and cardiovascular abnormalities. Similarly, only a sub-group of rats develops depressive-like symptoms following chronic mild stress exposure. Cardiovascular changes differ depending on individual stress susceptibility and may be related to an imbalance in the autonomic regulation of cardiac function in stress vulnerable subjects. Rodent models of stress that take into account individual phenotypic variations are useful for a better understanding of the role of neuroinflammatory and autonomic processes in the development of comorbid depression and cardiovascular disease under stressful conditions.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsAutonomic Nervous SystemCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDepressionDepressive DisorderDisease SusceptibilityHumansPhenotypeRodentiaStress, PsychologicalCardiovascular diseaseDepressionIndividual differencesRodentsStressVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID30259194
OpenAlexW2893130591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.