Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259176›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2018

Multifocal motor neuropathy in Austria: a nationwide survey of clinical features and response to treatment.

Wolfgang N Löscher, Eva-Maria Oberreiter, Marcus Erdler, Stefan Quasthoff, Valeriu Culea, Klaus Berek, Norbert Embacher, Susanne Grinzinger, Isolde Hess, Franz Stefan Höger and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang N LöscherDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. wolfgang.loescher@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-3222
Eva-Maria OberreiterDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marcus ErdlerDepartment of Neurology, SMZ Ost, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan QuasthoffDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Valeriu CuleaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Klaus BerekDepartment of Neurology, BKH Kufstein, Kufstein, Austria.
Norbert EmbacherDepartment of Neurology, St. Pölten University, Sankt Pölten, Austria.
Susanne GrinzingerDepartment of Neurology, Paracelsus University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Isolde HessNeurological Practice, Salzburg, Austria.
Franz Stefan HögerDepartment of Neurology, LKH Graz Süd-West, Graz, Austria.
Corinne G C HorlingsDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael HuemerDepartment of Neurology, Kardinal Schwarzenberg Hospital, Schwarzach im Pongau, Austria.
Julia Jecel2. Department of Neurology, KH Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Waltraud KleindienstDepartment of Neurology, Paracelsus University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Eva LaichDepartment of Neurology, LKH Steyr, Steyr, Austria.
Petra MüllerDepartment of Neurology, KH Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Dierk OelDepartment of Neurology, KH Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Wolfgang ÖrtlDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler-University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Eva LenzenwegerDepartment of Neurology 2, Johannes Kepler-University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Jakob RathDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus StadlerDepartment of Neurology, KH Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Karl StieglbauerNeurological Practice, Linz, Austria.
Claudia Thaler-WolfNeurological Practice, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Julia WanschitzDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Fritz ZimprichDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hakan CetinDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Raffi TopakianDepartment of Neurology, KH Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Salzburg · ATGraz University Hospital · ATKlinik Hietzing · ATTirol Kliniken · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Kufstein · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences St Pölten · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMultifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare neuropathy and detailed descriptions of larger patient cohorts are scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of MMN patients and their response to treatment in Austria and to compare these data with those from the literature.

methodsAnonymized demographic and clinical data about MMN patients until 31.12.2017 were collected from registered Austrian neurologists. Exploratory statistics on clinical and laboratory features as well as treatment regimens and responses were performed.

results57 Patients with MMN were identified, resulting in a prevalence of 0.65/100.000. Mean age of onset was 44.1 ± 13.1 years, the diagnostic delay 5.5 ± 8.4 years. In 77% of patients, symptom onset was in the upper limbs, and in 92%, it occurred in distal muscles. Proximal onset was never observed in the lower limbs. At the final follow-up, the majority of patients had atrophy (88%) in affected regions. Definite motor conduction blocks (CB) were found in 54 patients. Anti-GM1-IgM antibodies were present in 43%. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins improved muscle strength and INCAT score initially, but at last follow-up, both scores deteriorated to values before treatment. DISCUSSION: The findings of the present study corroborate the previous findings in MMN. Onset typically occurs in the upper limbs and mostly distal, CBs are found in the majority of cases, while anti-GM1-IgM antibodies are detected in only approximately 40%. Our study underlines that the initial good response to treatment fades over time.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge of OnsetAustriaAutoantibodiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesG(M1) GangliosideHumansImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurologistsPrevalenceAutoantibodiesG(M1) GangliosideImmunoglobulin MAnti-GM1 antibodyConduction blockIntravenous immunoglobulinMultifocal motor neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID30259176
PMCPMC6244652
OpenAlexW2893684535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.