Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259175›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018

Acute and Fulminant Myocarditis: a Pragmatic Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.

Enrico Ammirati, Giacomo Veronese, Manlio Cipriani, Francesco Moroni, Andrea Garascia, Michela Brambatti, Eric D Adler, Maria Frigerio

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guideline on Myocarditis - 2022.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. ANOCA, INOCA, MINOCA: The New Frontier of Coronary Syndromes.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Management Status of Myocarditis-Related Sudden Cardiac Death.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrico Ammirati"De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. enrico.ammirati@ospedaleniguarda.it.
Giacomo Veronese"De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Manlio Cipriani"De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MoroniVita-Salute San Raffaele University and Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Garascia"De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Michela BrambattiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eric D AdlerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Maria Frigerio"De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITUniversity of California, San Diego · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review the clinical features of acute myocarditis, including its fulminant presentation, and present a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis and treatment, considering indications of American and European Scientific Statements and recent data derived by large contemporary registries. RECENT

findingsPatients presenting with acute uncomplicated myocarditis (i.e., without left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmias) have a favorable short- and long-term prognosis: these findings do not support the indication to endomyocardial biopsy in this clinical scenario. Conversely, patients with complicated presentations, especially those with fulminant myocarditis, require an aggressive and comprehensive management, including endomyocardial biopsy and availability of advanced therapies for circulatory support. Although several immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies have been studied and are actually prescribed in the real-world practice, their effectiveness has not been clearly demonstrated. Patients with specific histological subtypes of acute myocarditis (i.e., giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis) or those affected by sarcoidosis or systemic autoimmune disorders seem to benefit most from immunosuppression. On the other hand, no clear evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with lymphocytic acute myocarditis, even though small series suggest a potential benefit. Acute myocarditis is a heterogeneous condition with distinct pathophysiological pathways. Further research is mandatory to identify factors and mechanisms that may trigger/maintain or counteract/repair the myocardial damage, in order to provide a rational for future evidence-based treatment of patients affected by this condition.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseHeart TransplantationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocarditisMyocardiumRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImmunosuppressive AgentsEndomyocardial biopsyFulminant myocarditisImmunosuppressionInflammatory cardiomyopathyMagnetic resonance imagingMyocarditis

Identifiers

PMID30259175
OpenAlexW2892799838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.