Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259145›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Hip biomechanics differ in responders and non-responders to an ACL injury prevention program.

Jeffrey B Taylor, Anh-Dung Nguyen, Sandra J Shultz, Kevin R Ford

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02530333 (Differential Biomechanical Effects of an ACL Injury Prevention Program in Women's Basketball and Soccer Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02530333 nacompletednot on this map

Differential Biomechanical Effects of an ACL Injury Prevention Program in Women's Basketball and Soccer Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorHigh Point UniversityRan2015 to 2015Enrolled99ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryArmsNeuromuscular Prevention Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey B TaylorDepartment of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA. jtaylor@highpoint.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6608-0192
Anh-Dung NguyenDepartment of Athletic Training, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
Sandra J ShultzDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Kevin R FordDepartment of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the differences in demographic, anthropometric, biomechanical, and/or performance variables between those that do (responders) and do not (non-responders) exhibit reductions in knee abduction moments after an anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention program (ACL-IPP).

methodsForty-three adolescent female athletes completed biomechanical (3D motion analysis of a drop vertical jump) and performance testing before and after randomization into a 6-week ACL-IPP. Participants were classified into responders and non-responders based on their level of reduction of knee abduction moment from pre- to post-test.

resultsCompared to non-responders, responders exhibited increased hip adduction excursion at baseline (p = 0.02) and trended towards attending more training sessions (p = 0.07) and participating in soccer and not basketball (p = 0.07). Responders also showed greater improvements in hip flexion angles (p = 0.02) and moments (p < 0.001), and knee abduction angles (p < 0.001) and excursions (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in age or experience with prior injury prevention programs (n.s.).

conclusionsAfter an ACL-IPP, athletes that exhibit the greatest reduction in knee abduction moments exhibit greater hip adduction excursion at baseline and show corresponding improvements in hip flexion and knee abduction kinematics and hip flexion moments. These results can help clinicians prospectively identify individuals that may not respond to an ACL-IPP and target individualized training for those at risk of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02530333.

Indexed as

AthletesAdolescentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBasketballBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHip JointHumansKnee JointMovementRisk FactorsSoccerYoung AdultAnterior cruciate ligamentInjury preventionKnee abduction momentsKnee valgus

Identifiers

PMID30259145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.