Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30259123›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2019

Molecular markers in bladder cancer.

Francesco Soria, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Tilman Todenhöfer, Jakub Dobruch, Anirban P Mitra, Brant A Inman, Kilian M Gust, Yair Lotan, Shahrokh F Shariat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04872036 (Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04872036 completednot on this map

Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2000 to 2017Enrolled66ConditionsBladder Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.International neurourology journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco SoriaDepartment of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Laura-Maria KrabbeDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Tilman TodenhöferDepartment of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Teubingen, Germany.
Jakub DobruchCentre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Anirban P MitraInstitute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brant A InmanDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kilian M GustDepartment of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-8453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUse of molecular markers in urine, tissue or blood offers potential opportunities to improve understanding of bladder cancer biology which may help identify disease earlier, risk stratify patients, improve prediction of outcomes or help target therapy.

methodsA review of the published literature was performed, without restriction of time.

resultsDespite the fast-growing literature about the topic and the approval of several urinary biomarkers for use in clinical practice, they have not reached the level of evidence for widespread utilization. Biomarkers could be used in different clinical scenarios, mainly to overcome the limitations of current diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic tools. They have been evaluated to detect bladder cancer in asymptomatic populations or those with hematuria and in surveillance of disease as adjuncts to cystoscopy. There is also a potential role as prognosticators of disease recurrence, progression and survival both in patients with non-invasive cancers and in those with advanced disease. Finally, they promise to be helpful in predicting the response to local and/or systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.

conclusionsTo date, due to the lack of high-quality prospective trials, the level of evidence provided by the current literature remains low and, therefore, the potential of biomarkers exceeds utilization in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AftercareBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancerBlood biomarkersGuidelinesTissue biomarkersUrinary biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30259123
PMCPMC6510866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.