Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30258789›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2018

The use of structural alerts to avoid the toxicity of pharmaceuticals.

Carmen Limban, Diana C Nuţă, Cornel Chiriţă, Simona Negreș, Andreea L Arsene, Marina Goumenou, Spyros P Karakitsios, Aristidis M Tsatsakis, Dimosthenis A Sarigiannis

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synthesis and initialBioImpacts : BI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Message Passing Neural Networks Improve Prediction of Metabolite Authenticity.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  16. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1ACS chemical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carmen Limban"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Traian Vuia 6, Bucharest, 020956, Romania.
Diana C Nuţă"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Traian Vuia 6, Bucharest, 020956, Romania.
Cornel Chiriţă"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Traian Vuia 6, Bucharest, 020956, Romania.
Simona Negreș"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Traian Vuia 6, Bucharest, 020956, Romania.
Andreea L Arsene"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Traian Vuia 6, Bucharest, 020956, Romania.
Marina GoumenouLaboratory of Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion, 71409, Crete, Greece.
Spyros P KarakitsiosAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, University Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Aristidis M TsatsakisLaboratory of Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion, 71409, Crete, Greece.
Dimosthenis A SarigiannisAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, University Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to identify compounds with potential toxicity problems, particular attention is paid to structural alerts, which are high chemical reactivity molecular fragments or fragments that can be transformed via bioactivation by human enzymes into fragments with high chemical reactivity. The concept has been introduced in order to reduce the likelihood that future candidate substances as pharmaceuticals will have undesirable toxic effects. A significant proportion (∼78-86%) of drugs characterized by residual toxicity contain structural alerts; there is also evidence indicating the formation of active metabolites as a causal factor for the toxicity of 62-69% of these molecules. On the other hand, the pharmacological action of certain drugs depends on the formation of reactive metabolites. Detailed assessment of the potential for the formation of active metabolites is recommended to characterize a biologically active compound. Although many prescribed drugs frequently contain structural alerts and form reactive metabolites, the vast majority of these drugs are administered in low daily doses. Avoiding structural alerts has become almost a norm in new drug design. An in-depth review of the biochemical reactivity of these structural alerts for new drug candidates is critical from a safety point of view and is currently being monitored in the discovery of drugs. The chemical strategies applied to structural alerts in molecules to limit the toxicity are: •partial replacement or full replacement of the structural alert;•reduction of electronic density;•introduction of a structural element of metabolic interest (metabolic switching);•multiple approaches. Therefore, chemical intervention strategies to eliminate bioactivation are often interactive processes; their success depends largely on a close working relationship between drug chemists, pharmacologists and researchers in metabolic science.

Indexed as

Active metabolitesStructural alertsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID30258789
PMCPMC6151358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.