ArticlePLoS currents2018
Quantification of the Light Subunit of Neurofilament Protein in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Huntington's Disease Patients.
Article in PLoS currents, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy: From Design to the Huntington Disease Clinic.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Review
- Neurocytoskeleton Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid of People With HIV-1 Subtypes B and C.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofilament light proteins (NFL) are a structural element of the neuronal cytoskeleton and are released with neuronal damage. Its levels are increased in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the setting of neurodegenerative diseases. We investigated the CSF-NFL levels of Huntington´s disease (HD) patients (participating in a clinical trial SAT-HD) as well as of premanifest carriers and compared their results with a sample of healthy controls and correlated CSF-NFL levels with demographic and clinical variables (baseline demographic characteristics and HD measures of disease severity). CSF levels were significantly higher in all HD subjects [5014.4 (1557.3) ng/l] and pre-manifest carriers [1050 (212.13) ng/l as compared to controls [331.4 (200.2) ng/l] (p<0.00) and were correlated with age (correlation coefficient -0.37, p<0.01) and CAG triplet number (0,51, p<0.05) in the subset of HD patients. NFL levels were not correlated with age in the control group. We did not find any correlation with the remaining variables. These results indicate, as in previous studies, that CSF-NFL levels are a marker of neuronal damage in HD. It seems to be a highly sensitive, but non-specific marker of axonal damage. One of the limitations of our study is a very small number of patients in pre-symptomatic group and lack of individuals with very advanced HD. Further investigations should focus on study of CSF-NFL levels in advanced patients, tracking prospectively CSF-NFL levels and analysing its correlation with the clinical course and usefulness to monitor disease progression, validation and quantification of NFL levels in more accessible biofluids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.