ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Advanced easySTED microscopy based on two-photon excitation by electrical modulations of light pulse wavefronts.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wavelength-tunable depletion expands fluorophore compatibility in two-photon STED nanoscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Improving two-photon excitation microscopy for sharper and faster biological imaging.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Single-scan volumetric imaging throughout thick tissue specimens by one-touch installable light-needle creating device.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Commercially derived versatile optical architecture for two-photon STED, wavelength mixing and label-free microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Biophysical research in Okazaki, Japan.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
- Efficient two-photon excitation stimulated emission depletion nanoscope exploiting spatiotemporal information.Neurophotonics · 2019Article
- Two-photon STED nanoscopy realizing 100-nm spatial resolution utilizing high-peak-power sub-nanosecond 655-nm pulses.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a compact stimulated emission depletion (STED) two-photon excitation microscopy that utilized electrically controllable components. Transmissive liquid crystal devices inserted directly in front of the objective lens converted the STED light into an optical vortex while leaving the excitation light unaffected. Light pulses of two different colors, 1.06 and 0.64 μm, were generated by laser diode-based light sources, and the delay between the two pulses was flexibly controlled so as to maximize the fluorescence suppression ratio. In our experiments, the spatial resolution of this system was up to three times higher than that obtained without STED light irradiation, and we successfully visualize the fine microtubule network structures in fixed mammalian cells without causing significant photo-damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.