Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30258628›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2018

Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression.

Ahmed A Elolimy, Mohamed K Abdelmegeid, Joshua C McCann, Daniel W Shike, Juan J Loor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Behavioural Traits inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Nutritional Modulation, Gut, and Omics Crosstalk in Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed A Elolimy1Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL USA.
Mohamed K Abdelmegeid1Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL USA.
Joshua C McCann2Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL USA.
Daniel W Shike2Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL USA.
Juan J Loor1Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-4365
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USKafrelsheikh University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidual feed intake (RFI) describes an animal's feed efficiency independent of growth performance. The objective of this study was to determine differences in growth performance, carcass traits, major bacteria attached to ruminal solids-fraction, and ruminal epithelium gene expression between the most-efficient and the least-efficient beef cattle. One-hundred and forty-nine Red Angus cattle were allocated to three contemporary groups according to sex and herd origin. Animals were fed a finishing diet in confinement for 70 d to determine the RFI category for each. Within each group, the two most-efficient (

resultsThe most-efficient animals consumed less feed (

conclusionsThe present study revealed that greater feed efficiency in beef cattle is associated with differences in bacterial species and transcriptional adaptations in the ruminal epithelium that might enhance nutrient delivery and utilization by tissues. The lack of RFI × sex interaction for growth performance and carcass traits indicates that sex may not play a major role in improving these phenotypes in superior RFI beef cattle. However, it is important to note that this result should not be considered a solid biomarker of efficient beef cattle prior to further examination due to the limited number of heifers compared with steers used in the study.

Indexed as

Beef cattleCarcassGene expressionGrowthRFIRuminal bacteriaRuminal epitheliumSex

Identifiers

PMID30258628
PMCPMC6151901
OpenAlexW2888917829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.