Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30258279›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2018

An Effective Pipeline Based on Relative Coverage for the Genome Assembly of Phytoplasmas and Other Fastidious Prokaryotes.

Cesare Polano, Giuseppe Firrao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cesare PolanoDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giuseppe FirraoDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the plant pathogenic phytoplasmas, as well as for several fastidious prokaryotes, axenic cultivation is extremely difficult or not possible yet; therefore, even with second generation sequencing methods, obtaining the sequence of their genomes is challenging due to host sequence contamination.

objectiveWith the Phytoassembly pipeline here presented, we aim to provide a method to obtain high quality genome drafts for the phytoplasmas and other uncultivable plant pathogens, by exploiting the coverage differential in the ILLUMINA sequences from the pathogen and the host, and using the sequencing of a healthy, isogenic plant as a filter. VALIDATION: The pipeline has been benchmarked using simulated and real ILLUMINA runs from phytoplasmas whose genome is known, and it was then used to obtain high quality drafts for three new phytoplasma genomes.

conclusionFor phytoplasma infected samples containing >2-4% of pathogen DNA and an isogenic reference healthy sample, the resulting assemblies can be next to complete. The Phytoassembly source code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/cpolano/phytoassembly.

Indexed as

Candidatus phytoplasmaEndophytesGenome draftILLUMINANGSSecond generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30258279
PMCPMC6128390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.