Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30258048›Full record

SynthesisEmerging microbes & infections2018

A systematic review of evidence that enteroviruses may be zoonotic.

Jane K Fieldhouse, Xinye Wang, Kerry A Mallinson, Rick W Tsao, Gregory C Gray

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emerging microbes & infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lack of molecular evidence of fecal-borne viruses in capybaras from São Paulo state, Brazil, 2018-2020: a minor public health issue.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Technical requirements for cultured meat production: a review.Journal of animal science and technology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jane K FieldhouseDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. jane.fieldhouse@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-0970
Xinye WangGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, 215316, Jiangsu, China.
Kerry A MallinsonDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Rick W TsaoDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Gregory C GrayDivision of Infectious Disease and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-5908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteroviruses infect millions of humans annually worldwide, primarily infants and children. With a high mutation rate and frequent recombination, enteroviruses are noted to evolve and change over time. Given the evidence that human enteroviruses are commonly found in other mammalian species and that some human and animal enteroviruses are genetically similar, it is possible that enzootic enteroviruses may also be infecting human populations. We conducted a systematic review of the English and Chinese literature published between 2007 and 2017 to examine evidence that enteroviruses may be zoonotic. Of the 2704 articles screened for inclusion, 16 articles were included in the final review. The review of these articles yielded considerable molecular evidence of zooanthroponosis transmission, particularly among non-human primates. While there were more limited instances of anthropozoonosis transmission, the available data support the biological plausibility of cross-species transmission and the need to conduct periodic surveillance at the human-animal interface.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnterovirusEnterovirus InfectionsHumansZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID30258048
PMCPMC6158190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.