Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30257912›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

An innovative ovipositor for niche exploitation impacts genital coevolution between sexes in a fruit-damaging

Leona Muto, Yoshitaka Kamimura, Kentaro M Tanaka, Aya Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gustatory sensing by ovipositor drives maternal avoidance of hesperidin to benefit the offspring in a major agricultural fly pest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resolving between novelty and homology in the rapidly evolving phallus of Drosophila.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Royal Society open science · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leona MutoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji 192-0397, Japan.
Yoshitaka KamimuraDepartment of Biology, Keio University, Yokohama 233-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2882-491X
Kentaro M TanakaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji 192-0397, Japan.
Aya TakahashiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji 192-0397, Japan ayat@tmu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-7417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited attention has been given to ecological factors influencing the coevolution of male and female genitalia. The innovative ovipositor of

Indexed as

CopulationAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophilaEcosystemFemaleFruitGenitalia, FemaleGenitalia, MaleMaleOvipositionSpecies Specificitycoevolution between the sexesDrosophila subpulchrellaDrosophila suzukiimechanical incompatibilitymorphology of genitalia

Identifiers

PMID30257912
PMCPMC6170814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.