ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018
Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-Implementing Low-Value Care in Dentistry: The Case for Choosing Wisely Campaigns.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- From CXR to ultrasound: a multi-framework approach to advancing De-implementation in acute care.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Perceptions of the usefulness of Choosing Wisely among general practitioners in Norway: a nationwide survey.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Behavioral Interventions on Surgeons' Preoperative Decision-Making: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis.The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- Factors of a physician quality improvement leadership coalition that influence physician behaviour: a mixed methods study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Canadian medical student perceptions of the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Identifying Modifiable System-Level Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Patient and family involvement in Choosing Wisely initiatives: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- How artificial intelligence can help us 'Choose Wisely'.Bioelectronic medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.BMC health services research · 2020Review
- Hospital doctors' attitudes to brief educational messages that aim to modify diagnostic test requests: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Understanding the public's role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers' Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Physiotherapists' views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association's Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Highlighting the need for de-implementation - Choosing Wisely recommendations based on clinical practice guidelines.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReducing monies spent on unnecessary medical care is one possible target to improve value in healthcare systems. Regional variation in the provision of medical care suggests physician behaviour and patient demands influence the provision of unnecessary medical care. Recently, Choosing Wisely campaigns began using 'top 5 do-not-do' lists to target unnecessary medical care by encouraging greater physician and patient dialogue at the point of care. The present study aims to examine the rationale for Choosing Wisely Canada's (CWC) design and to analyse physician perceptions regarding the features of CWC aimed to reduce unnecessary medical care.
methodsThe study involved semi-structured interviews with 19 key informant physicians with CWC experience and the application of procedures of grounded theory to analyse interview transcripts and develop explanations addressing the objectives.
resultsParticipants reported that the CWC was the medical community's response to three pressures, namely (1) demand for unnecessary medical care from patients during the clinical encounter; (2) public perception that physicians do not always prioritise patients' needs; and (3) 'blunt' government tools aimed to reduce costs rather than improving patient care. Respondents stated that involving the patient in decision-making would help alleviate these pressures by promoting the clinical encounter as the paramount decision-point in achieving necessary care. However, CWC does not address several of the key reasons, from a physician perspective, for providing unnecessary medical care, including time pressures in the clinical encounter, uncertainty about the optimal care pathway and fear of litigation.
conclusionThis study contributes to our understanding of the perceptions of physicians regarding the CWC campaign. Specifically, physicians believe that CWC does little to address the clinical reasons for unnecessary medical care. Ultimately, because CWC has limited impact on physician behaviour or patient expectations, it is unlikely to have a major influence on unnecessary medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.