Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30257530›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Influence of Incident Wavelength and Detector Material Selection on Fluorescence in the Application of Raman Spectroscopy to a Fungal Fermentation Process.

Stephen Goldrick, David Lovett, Gary Montague, Barry Lennox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microplastic Pollution: Chemical Characterization and Impact on Wildlife.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen GoldrickBiopharmaceutical Bioprocess Technology Centre, Merz Court, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK. s.goldrick@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8319-1679
David LovettPerceptive Engineering Limited, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, Cheshire WA4 4AB, UK. dlovett@perceptiveapc.com.
Gary MontagueSchool of Science, Engineering & Design, Teeside University, Tees Valley TS1 3BX, UK. G.Montague@tees.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-945X
Barry LennoxControl Systems Group, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. barry.lennox@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0905-8324

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G037620/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is a novel tool used in the on-line monitoring and control of bioprocesses, offering both quantitative and qualitative determination of key process variables through spectroscopic analysis. However, the wide-spread application of Raman spectroscopy analysers to industrial fermentation processes has been hindered by problems related to the high background fluorescence signal associated with the analysis of biological samples. To address this issue, we investigated the influence of fluorescence on the spectra collected from two Raman spectroscopic devices with different wavelengths and detectors in the analysis of the critical process parameters (CPPs) and critical quality attributes (CQAs) of a fungal fermentation process. The spectra collected using a Raman analyser with the shorter wavelength (903 nm) and a charged coupled device detector (CCD) was corrupted by high fluorescence and was therefore unusable in the prediction of these CPPs and CQAs. In contrast, the spectra collected using a Raman analyser with the longer wavelength (993 nm) and an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) detector was only moderately affected by fluorescence and enabled the generation of accurate estimates of the fermentation's critical variables. This novel work is the first direct comparison of two different Raman spectroscopy probes on the same process highlighting the significant detrimental effect caused by high fluorescence on spectra recorded throughout fermentation runs. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates the importance of correctly selecting both the incident wavelength and detector material type of the Raman spectroscopy devices to ensure corrupting fluorescence is minimised during bioprocess monitoring applications.

Indexed as

critical process parameterscritical quality attributesfermentation monitoringfluorescencePLS modellingRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID30257530
PMCPMC6315725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.