Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30257521›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Novel Setup and Protocol to Measure the Range of Motion of the Wrist and the Hand.

Kostas Nizamis, Noortje H M Rijken, Ana Mendes, Mariska M H P Janssen, Arjen Bergsma, Bart F J M Koopman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review.Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kostas NizamisDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. k.nizamis@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-0242
Noortje H M RijkenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands. n.h.rijken@utwente.nl.
Ana MendesDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. amendes06@hotmail.com.
Mariska M H P JanssenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Mariska.Janssen@radboudumc.nl.
Arjen BergsmaDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. a.bergsma@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2177-5115
Bart F J M KoopmanDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. h.f.j.m.koopman@utwente.nl.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 13525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human hand is important for the performance of activities of daily living which are directly related to quality of life. Various conditions, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can affect the function of the human hand and wrist. The ability to assess the impairment in the hand and the wrist by measuring the range of motion (ROM), is essential for the development of effective rehabilitation protocols. Currently the clinical standard is the goniometer. In this study we explore the feasibility and reliability of an optical sensor (Leap motion sensor) in measuring active hand/wrist ROM. We measured the hand/wrist ROM of 20 healthy adults with the goniometer and the Leap motion sensor, in order to check the agreement between the two methods and additionally, we performed a test-retest of the Leap motion sensor with 12 of them, to assess its reliability. The results suggest low agreement between the goniometer and the leap motion sensor, yet showing a large decrease in measurement time and high reliability when using the later. Despite the low agreement between the two methods, we believe that the Leap motion sensor shows potential to contribute to the development of hand rehabilitation protocols and be used with patients in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAdultFemaleHandHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsWristYoung Adultdistal upper extremitiesgoniometerhandleap motion sensormotion capturerange-of-motionrehabilitationwrist

Identifiers

PMID30257521
PMCPMC6210232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.