Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30257508›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

An In Vitro Model of Angiogenesis during Wound Healing Provides Insights into the Complex Role of Cells and Factors in the Inflammatory and Proliferation Phase.

Sebastian Beyer, Maria Koch, Yie Hou Lee, Friedrich Jung, Anna Blocki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Update of Phytotherapeutic Advances of Marigold (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sebastian BeyerInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China. sebastian.beyer@cuhk.edu.hk.
Maria KochBioSyM Interdisciplinary Research Group, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 229899, Singapore. maria.koch@hdr.qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-0955
Yie Hou LeeBioSyM Interdisciplinary Research Group, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 229899, Singapore. gmsleeyh@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-2723-2023
Friedrich JungInstitute for Clinical Hemostasiology and Transfusion Medicine, University Saarland, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. dihkf@saarmail.de.
Anna BlockiInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China. anna.blocki@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-9878-3781
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGQueensland University of Technology · AUSaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful vascularization is essential in wound healing, the histo-integration of biomaterials, and other aspects of regenerative medicine. We developed a functional in vitro assay to dissect the complex processes directing angiogenesis during wound healing, whereby vascular cell spheroids were induced to sprout in the presence of classically (M1) or alternatively (M2) activated macrophages. This simulated a microenvironment, in which sprouting cells were exposed to the inflammatory or proliferation phases of wound healing, respectively. We showed that M1 macrophages induced single-cell migration of endothelial cells and pericytes. In contrast, M2 macrophages augmented endothelial sprouting, suggesting that vascular cells infiltrate the wound bed during the inflammatory phase and extensive angiogenesis is initiated upon a switch to a predominance of M2. Interestingly, M1 and M2 shared a pro-angiogenic secretome, whereas pro-inflammatory cytokines were solely secreted by M1. These results suggested that acute inflammatory factors act as key inducers of vascular cell infiltration and as key negative regulators of angiogenesis, whereas pro-angiogenic factors are present throughout early wound healing. This points to inflammatory factors as key targets to modulate angiogenesis. The here-established wound healing assay represents a useful tool to investigate the effect of biomaterials and factors on angiogenesis during wound healing.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationMacrophage ActivationNeovascularization, PhysiologicWound HealingCell LineCell MovementCytokinesEndothelial CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsInflammationInflammation MediatorsMacrophagesPericytesCytokinesInflammation Mediatorsangiogenesiscytokineendothelial cellsin vitro modelmacrophagespericytessphingolipidwound healing

Identifiers

PMID30257508
PMCPMC6213254
OpenAlexW2894185254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.