Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256946›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2019

How to estimate mortality trends from grouped vital statistics.

Silvia Rizzi, Ulrich Halekoh, Mikael Thinggaard, Gerda Engholm, Niels Christensen, Tom Børge Johannesen, Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Competing risks models with two time scales.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Spatial Inequities in Life Expectancy in Small Areas of Buenos Aires, Argentina 2015-2017.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia RizziInstitute of Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ulrich HalekohInstitute of Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mikael ThinggaardInstitute of Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Gerda EngholmDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels ChristensenDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tom Børge JohannesenNorwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway.
Rune Lindahl-JacobsenInstitute of Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality data at the population level are often aggregated in age classes, for example 5-year age groups with an open-ended interval for the elderly aged 85+. Capturing detailed age-specific mortality patterns and mortality time trends from such coarsely grouped data can be problematic at older ages, especially where open-ended intervals are used.

methodsWe illustrate the penalized composite link model (PCLM) for ungrouping to model cancer mortality surfaces. Smooth age-specific distributions from data grouped in age classes of adjacent calendar years were estimated by constructing a two-dimensional regression, based on B-splines, and maximizing a penalized likelihood. We show the applicability of the proposed model, analysing age-at-death distributions from cancers of all sites in Denmark from 1980 to 2014. Data were retrieved from the Danish Cancer Society and the Human Mortality Database.

resultsThe main trends captured by PCLM are: (i) a decrease in cancer mortality rates after the 1990s for ages 50-75; (ii) a decrease in cancer mortality in later cohorts for young ages, especially, and very advanced ages. Comparing the raw data by single year of age, with the PCLM-ungrouped distributions, we clearly illustrate that the model fits the data with a high level of accuracy.

conclusionsThe PCLM produces detailed smooth mortality surfaces from death counts observed in coarse age groups with modest assumptions, that is Poisson distributed counts and smoothness of the estimated distribution. Hence, the method has great potential for use within epidemiological research when information is to be gained from aggregated data, because it avoids strict assumptions about the actual distributional shape.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalForecastingVital StatisticsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDenmarkFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Newbornoldest oldpenalized composite link modelsmoothingtwo dimensionsungroupingVital statistics

Identifiers

PMID30256946
PMCPMC6469310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.