ArticlePloS one2018
Bona fide choline monoxygenases evolved in Amaranthaceae plants from oxygenases of unknown function: Evidence from phylogenetics, homology modeling and docking studies.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few land plants can synthesize and accumulate the osmoprotectant glycine betaine (GB) even though this metabolic trait has major adaptive importance given the prevalence of drought, hypersaline soils or cold. GB is synthesized from choline in two reactions catalyzed by choline monooxygenases (CMOs) and enzymes of the family 10 of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH10s) that gained betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase activity (BADH). Homolog genes encoding CMO and ALDH10 enzymes are present in all known land plant genomes, but since GB-non-accumulators plants lack the BADH-type ALDH10 isozyme, they would be expected to also lack the CMO activity to avoid accumulation of the toxic betaine aldehyde. To explore CMOs substrate specificity, we performed amino acid sequence alignments, phylogenetic analysis, homology modeling and docking simulations. We found that plant CMOs form a monophyletic subfamily within the Rieske/mononuclear non-heme oxygenases family with two clades: CMO1 and CMO2, the latter diverging from CMO1 after gene duplication. CMO1 enzymes are present in all plants; CMO2s only in the Amaranthaceae high-GB-accumulators plants. CMO2s, and particularly their mononuclear non-heme iron domain where the active site is located, evolved at a faster rate than CMO1s, which suggests positive selection. The homology model and docking simulations of the spinach CMO2 enzyme showed at the active site three aromatic residues forming a box with which the trimethylammonium group of choline could interact through cation-π interactions, and a glutamate, which also may interact with the trimethylammonium group through a charge-charge interaction. The aromatic box and the carboxylate have been shown to be critical for choline binding in other proteins. Interestingly, these residues are conserved in CMO2 proteins but not in CMO1 proteins, where two of these aromatic residues are leucine and the glutamate is asparagine. These findings reinforce our proposal that the CMO1s physiological substrate is not choline but a still unknown metabolite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.