Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256504›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Differential brain mechanisms for processing distracting information in task-relevant and -irrelevant dimensions in visual search.

Ping Wei, Hongbo Yu, Hermann J Müller, Stefan Pollmann, Xiaolin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiple processes independently predict motor learning.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ping WeiBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3781-3844
Hongbo YuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hermann J MüllerGeneral & Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Stefan PollmannDepartment of Experimental Psychology and Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Xiaolin ZhouSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-4360

Funding

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology BAICIT-2016018Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC779-A4Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU773/14-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU773/16-1National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) 2010CB833904National Natural Science Foundation of China 31470979National Natural Science Foundation of China 31470980National Natural Science Foundation of China 90920012Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of 13th Five-year Plan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial function of our goal-directed behavior is to select task-relevant targets among distractor stimuli, some of which may share properties with the target and thus compete for attentional selection. Here, by applying functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to a visual search task in which a target was embedded in an array of distractors that were homogeneous or heterogeneous along the task-relevant (orientation or form) and/or task-irrelevant (color) dimensions, we demonstrate that for both (orientation) feature search and (form) conjunction search, the fusiform gyrus is involved in processing the task-irrelevant color information, while the bilateral frontal eye fields (FEF), the cortex along the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the left junction of intraparietal and transverse occipital sulci (IPTO) are involved in processing task-relevant distracting information, especially for target-absent trials. Moreover, in conjunction (but not in feature) search, activity in these frontoparietal regions is affected by stimulus heterogeneity along the task-irrelevant dimension: heterogeneity of the task-irrelevant information increases the activity in these regions only when the task-relevant information is homogeneous, not when it is heterogeneous. These findings suggest that differential neural mechanisms are involved in processing task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions of the searched-for objects. In addition, they show that the top-down task set plays a dominant role in determining whether or not task-irrelevant information can affect the processing of the task-relevant dimension in the frontoparietal regions.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adultconjunction searchfeature searchfMRItask-irrelevanttask-relevantvisual search

Identifiers

PMID30256504
PMCPMC8022275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.