Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256201›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of international advanced otology2018

Characteristics of Stimulus Intensity in Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus.

Won Choi Suk, Su Jin Kim, Dong Sik Chang, Ho Yun Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of international advanced otology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pilot evaluation of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in chronic tinnitus: clinical outcomes and DTI insights.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tinnitus and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Won Choi SukDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, Republic Of.
Su Jin KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, Republic Of.
Dong Sik ChangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, Republic Of.
Ho Yun LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, Republic Of.
Eulji University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to assess the clinical significance of the intensity of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) in chronic tinnitus. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour sessions of tVNS were performed over a 2-week period for 24 patients with unilateral, non-pulsatile chronic tinnitus. The cavum, cymba, and tragus were sequentially stimulated to the maximal sensory thresholds. One month later, after the four sessions, the level of tinnitus distress and changes in stimulus intensity were assessed.

resultsThe stimulus intensity did not differ according to sex or laterality. However, a moderate positive correlation between tinnitus distress and the initial stimulus intensity was observed. This correlation was not observed during the subsequent sessions. The stimulus intensity at the cavum changed significantly (p=0.018), and notable differences in tinnitus annoyance were observed between the responders and non-responders (p=0.006).

conclusionThe effect of stimulus intensity on the treatment outcome seems to be limited. An increasing trend in the stimulus intensity for tinnitus annoyance at the cavum was observed in the responders. Therefore, the cavum may be an optimal stimulation site for tVNS.

Indexed as

AdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSensory ThresholdsTinnitusTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeVagus NerveVagus Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30256201
PMCPMC6354472
OpenAlexW2886419776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.