ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2018
White Paper for Global Palliative Care Advocacy: Recommendations from a PAL-LIFE Expert Advisory Group of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07554209 (Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care: A Multicriteria Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey (MULTIPAL)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived and received support among patients with cancer receiving palliative care in Malta: a qualitative study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Defining advocacy in public health: a scoping review to inform policy, training, and equity-oriented action.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the MOS social support survey among caregivers of patients with advanced illness receiving palliative care.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Argument-based QUalitative Analysis strategy (AQUA) for analyzing free-text responses in health sciences Delphi studies.MethodsX · 2023Article
- Strategies for knowledge translation of a palliative approach outside specialized palliative care services: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Comprehensive care for people living with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-Integration of palliative care with disease-specific care: From guidelines to practice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Caring Advanced Cancer Patients at Home During COVID-19 Outbreak: Burnout and Psychological Morbidity Among Palliative Care Professionals in Italy.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Article
- The relationship between workload and burnout among nurses: The buffering role of personal, social and organisational resources.PloS one · 2021Article
- Rethinking palliative care in a public health context: addressing the needs of persons with non-communicable chronic diseases.Primary health care research & development · 2020Article
- Forging a New Frontier: Providing Palliative Care to People With Cancer in Rural and Remote Areas.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Review
- Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Collaboration Makes Us Better: Time to Increase Equity in the Science of Hospice and Palliative Care.Journal of palliative medicine · 2019Article
- Empowering Nurses to Meet Challenges and Lead Palliative Care for Achieving Triple Billion Targets.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) is an academic institution of the Holy See (Vatican), which aims to develop and promote Catholic teachings on questions of biomedical ethics. Palliative care (PC) experts from around the world professing different faiths were invited by the PAV to develop strategic recommendations for the global development of PC ("PAL-LIFE group").
designThirteen experts in PC advocacy participated in an online Delphi process. In four iterative rounds, participants were asked to identify the most significant stakeholder groups and then propose for each, strategic recommendations to advance PC. Each round incorporated the feedback from previous rounds until consensus was achieved on the most important recommendations. In a last step, the ad hoc group was asked to rank the stakeholders' groups by order of importance on a 13-point scale and to propose suggestions for implementation. A cluster analysis provided a classification of the stakeholders in different levels of importance for PC development.
resultsThirteen stakeholder groups and 43 recommendations resulted from the first round, and, of those, 13 recommendations were chosen as the most important (1 for each stakeholder group). Five groups had higher scores. The recommendation chosen for these top 5 groups were as follows: (1) Policy makers: Ensure universal access to PC; (2) Academia: Offer mandatory PC courses to undergraduates; (3) Healthcare workers: PC professionals should receive adequate certification; (4) Hospitals and healthcare centers: Every healthcare center should ensure access to PC medicines; and (5) PC associations: National Associations should be effective advocates and work with their governments in the process of implementing international policy framework. A recommendation for each of the remaining eight groups is also presented. DISCUSSION: This white paper represents a position statement of the PAV developed through a consensus process in regard to advocacy strategies for the advancement of PC in the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.