Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256135›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2018

White Paper for Global Palliative Care Advocacy: Recommendations from a PAL-LIFE Expert Advisory Group of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City.

Carlos Centeno, Thomas Sitte, Liliana de Lima, Sami Alsirafy, Eduardo Bruera, Mary Callaway, Kathleen Foley, Emmanuel Luyirika, Daniela Mosoiu, Katherine Pettus and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07554209 (Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07554209 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals of Key Domains of Home-Based Palliative Care: A Multicriteria Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey (MULTIPAL)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeRan2026 to 2026Enrolled580ConditionsHome Care, Hospital-Based, Palliative Care, Health Services Research, Decision Making
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Forging a New Frontier: Providing Palliative Care to People With Cancer in Rural and Remote Areas.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  12. Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.Frontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carlos Centeno1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Thomas Sitte1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Liliana de Lima1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Sami Alsirafy1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Eduardo Bruera1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Mary Callaway1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Kathleen Foley1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Emmanuel Luyirika1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Daniela Mosoiu1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Katherine Pettus1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Christina Puchalski1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
M R Rajagopal1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Julianna Yong1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
Eduardo Garralda1 PAL-LIFE Project-Pontifical Academy for Life, International Advisory Group for Global Palliative Care Advocacy , Vatican City.
John Y Rhee13 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
Nunziata Comoretto14 Pontifical Academy for Life , Vatican City.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) is an academic institution of the Holy See (Vatican), which aims to develop and promote Catholic teachings on questions of biomedical ethics. Palliative care (PC) experts from around the world professing different faiths were invited by the PAV to develop strategic recommendations for the global development of PC ("PAL-LIFE group").

designThirteen experts in PC advocacy participated in an online Delphi process. In four iterative rounds, participants were asked to identify the most significant stakeholder groups and then propose for each, strategic recommendations to advance PC. Each round incorporated the feedback from previous rounds until consensus was achieved on the most important recommendations. In a last step, the ad hoc group was asked to rank the stakeholders' groups by order of importance on a 13-point scale and to propose suggestions for implementation. A cluster analysis provided a classification of the stakeholders in different levels of importance for PC development.

resultsThirteen stakeholder groups and 43 recommendations resulted from the first round, and, of those, 13 recommendations were chosen as the most important (1 for each stakeholder group). Five groups had higher scores. The recommendation chosen for these top 5 groups were as follows: (1) Policy makers: Ensure universal access to PC; (2) Academia: Offer mandatory PC courses to undergraduates; (3) Healthcare workers: PC professionals should receive adequate certification; (4) Hospitals and healthcare centers: Every healthcare center should ensure access to PC medicines; and (5) PC associations: National Associations should be effective advocates and work with their governments in the process of implementing international policy framework. A recommendation for each of the remaining eight groups is also presented. DISCUSSION: This white paper represents a position statement of the PAV developed through a consensus process in regard to advocacy strategies for the advancement of PC in the world.

Indexed as

Global HealthAdvisory CommitteesAttitude of Health PersonnelCatholicismCertificationConsensusDelphi TechniqueHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPalliative CarePalliative MedicineVatican Cityadvocacydevelopmentglobalpalliative careposition statement

Identifiers

PMID30256135
PMCPMC6201784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.