Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256117›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2018

Identifying High-Priority Proteins Across the Human Diseasome Using Semantic Similarity.

Edward Lau, Vidya Venkatraman, Cody T Thomas, Joseph C Wu, Jennifer E Van Eyk, Maggie P Y Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward LauStanford Cardiovascular Institute , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9083-5922
Vidya VenkatramanAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, Department of Medicine and The Heart Institute , Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles , California 90048 , United States.
Cody T ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Consortium for Fibrosis Research and Translation, Anschutz Medical Campus , University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , Colorado 80045 , United States.
Joseph C WuStanford Cardiovascular Institute , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.
Jennifer E Van EykAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, Department of Medicine and The Heart Institute , Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles , California 90048 , United States.
Maggie P Y LamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Consortium for Fibrosis Research and Translation, Anschutz Medical Campus , University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , Colorado 80045 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-8319

Funding

Protein Chemistry and ProteomicsP01HL112730 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MENTZER, ROBERT M · 2013 to 2017
$12.0M
Human iPSCs for Elucidating Intercellular Crosstalk Signaling in Dilated CardiomyopathyR01HL141371 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, WING H., WU, JOSEPH C. · 2018 to 2025
$6.2M
Alternative Protein Isoforms in Ventricular RemodelingR01HL141278 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Maggie Lam · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
ER Stress and Protein Dynamics in Cardiac RemodelingR00HL127302 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LAM, MAGGIE · 2017 to 2019
$731k
Identifying Markers of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte (iPSC-CM) MaturityF32HL139045 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAU, EDWARD · 2017 to 2018
$92k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL139045NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL112730NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL127302NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141278NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the genes and proteins associated with a biological process or disease is a central goal of the biomedical research enterprise. However, relatively few systematic approaches are available that provide objective evaluation of the genes or proteins known to be important to a research topic, and hence researchers often rely on subjective evaluation of domain experts and laborious manual literature review. Computational bibliometric analysis, in conjunction with text mining and data curation, attempts to automate this process and return prioritized proteins in any given research topic. We describe here a method to identify and rank protein-topic relationships by calculating the semantic similarity between a protein and a query term in the biomerical literature while adjusting for the impact and immediacy of associated research articles. We term the calculated metric the weighted copublication distance (WCD) and show that it compares well to related approaches in predicting benchmark protein lists in multiple biological processes. We used WCD to extract prioritized "popular proteins" across multiple cell types, subanatomical regions, and standardized vocabularies containing over 20 000 human disease terms. The collection of protein-disease associations across the resulting human "diseasome" supports data analytical workflows to perform reverse protein-to-disease queries and functional annotation of experimental protein lists. We envision that the described improvement to the popular proteins strategy will be useful for annotating protein lists and guiding method development efforts as well as generating new hypotheses on understudied disease proteins using bibliometric information.

Indexed as

BibliometricsSemanticsBiomedical ResearchData MiningDiseaseHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsProteinsbibliometric analysisdiseasomehigh-priority proteinsnormalized copublication distancepopular proteinssemantic similaritytargeted proteomicsweighted copublication distance

Identifiers

PMID30256117
PMCPMC6606054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.