Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30256116›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2018

Comprehensive and Reproducible Untargeted Lipidomic Workflow Using LC-QTOF Validated for Human Plasma Analysis.

Anik Forest, Matthieu Ruiz, Bertrand Bouchard, Gabrielle Boucher, Olivier Gingras, Caroline Daneault, Isabelle Robillard Frayne, David Rhainds, iGenoMed Consortium, NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Platelet lipidome alterations in septic shock: a matched case-control study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of obesity on day-night differences in cardiac metabolism.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anik ForestMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Matthieu RuizMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Bertrand BouchardMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Gabrielle BoucherMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Olivier GingrasMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Caroline DaneaultMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Isabelle Robillard FrayneMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
David RhaindsMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
iGenoMed Consortium
NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium
Jean-Claude TardifMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
John D RiouxMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.
Christine Des RosiersMontreal Heart Institute , Research Center, 5000 Belanger Street , Montreal , Quebec H1T 1C8 , Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2449-8440

Funding

Universite de Montreal IBD Genetics Research CenterU01DK062432 · NIDDK · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI John D. Rioux · 2002 to 2026
$9.6M
CIHR 102168CIHR 9575NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this work was to develop a label-free, comprehensive, and reproducible high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based untargeted lipidomic workflow using a single instrument, which could be applied to biomarker discovery in both basic and clinical studies. For this, we have (i) optimized lipid extraction and elution to enhance coverage of polar and nonpolar lipids as well as resolution of their isomers, (ii) ensured MS signal reproducibility and linearity, and (iii) developed a bioinformatic pipeline to correct remaining biases. Workflow validation is reported for 48 replicates of a single human plasma sample: 1124 reproducible LC-MS signals were extracted (median signal intensity RSD = 10%), 50% of which are redundant due to adducts, dimers, in-source fragmentation, contaminations, or positive and negative ion duplicates. From the resulting 578 unique compounds, 428 lipids were identified by MS/MS, including acyl chain composition, of which 394 had RSD < 30% inside their linear intensity range, thereby enabling robust semiquantitation. MS signal intensity spanned 4 orders of magnitude, covering 16 lipid subclasses. Finally, the power of our workflow is illustrated by a proof-of-concept study in which 100 samples from healthy human subjects were analyzed and the data set was investigated using three different statistical testing strategies in order to compare their capacity in identifying the impact of sex and age on circulating lipids.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidComputational BiologyHealthy VolunteersHumansLipidsMetabolomeMolecular Sequence AnnotationPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryLipidsannotationcoveragelipid isomerslipidomicslipidsmass spectrometryreproducibilityuntargetedWGCNAworkflow

Identifiers

PMID30256116
PMCPMC6572761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.