Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255963›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2018

Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.

Ashley T Tao, Yunhong Shu, Ek T Tan, Joshua D Trzasko, Shengzhen Tao, Robert D Reid, Paul T Weavers, John Huston, Matt A Bernstein

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley T TaoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-4981
Yunhong ShuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ek T TanGE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York, USA.
Joshua D TrzaskoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shengzhen TaoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-3491
Robert D ReidDepartment of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul T WeaversDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John HustonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matt A BernsteinDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USGE Global Research (United States) · US

Funding

Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
High Performance, Highly Deployable Head-Only MRI ScannerR01EB010065 · NIBIB · GENERAL ELECTRIC GLOBAL RESEARCH CTR · PI BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW A., FOO, THOMAS K · 2010 to 2015
$5.5M
High-performance compact 3T MRI: Technical optimization for advanced brain imagingU01EB024450 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW A., FOO, THOMAS K · 2017 to 2021
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010065NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB024450NIH HHS BRP-R01-EB010065NIH HHS U01-EB024450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGradient nonlinearity (GNL) leads to biased apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in diffusion-weighted imaging. A gradient nonlinearity correction (GNLC) method has been developed for whole body systems, but is yet to be tested for the new compact 3T (C3T) scanner, which exhibits more complex GNL due to its asymmetrical design. PURPOSE: To assess the improvement of ADC quantification with GNLC for the C3T scanner. STUDY TYPE: Phantom measurements and retrospective analysis of patient data. PHANTOM/SUBJECTS: A diffusion quality control phantom with vials containing 0-30% polyvinylpyrrolidone in water was used. For in vivo data, 12 patient exams were analyzed (median age, 33). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Imaging was performed on the C3T and two commercial 3T scanners. A clinical DWI (repetition time [TR] = 10,000 msec, echo time [TE] = minimum, b = 1000 s/mm ASSESSMENT: The 0% vial was measured along three orthogonal axes, and at two different temperatures. The ADC for each concentration was compared between the C3T and two whole-body scanners. Cerebrospinal fluid and white matter ADCs were quantified for each patient and compared to values in literature. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

resultsFor all PVP concentrations, the corrected ADC was within 2.5% of the reference ADC. On average, the ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and white matter post-GNLC were within 1% and 6%, respectively, of values reported in the literature and were significantly different from the uncorrected data (P < 0.05). DATA

conclusionThis study demonstrated that GNL effects were more severe for the C3T due to the asymmetric gradient design, but our implementation of a GNLC compensated for these effects, resulting in ADC values that are in good agreement with values from the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1498-1507.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNonlinear DynamicsPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultapparent diffusion coefficientdiffusion weighted imaginggradient non-linearity

Identifiers

PMID30255963
PMCPMC6263730
OpenAlexW2893994040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.