ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2018
Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consistent Quadratic Phase Formation in 3D Fast Spin Echo Using Frequency-Modulated RF Pulses.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of diffusion-weighted MRI in biological image-guided radiation therapy: a roadmap.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Cartesian MaxGIRF: Model-based EPI reconstruction incorporating gradient nonlinearity and concomitant field effects.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Is correction for gradient nonlinearity necessary in a brain diffusion tensor MRI clinical study?PloS one · 2026Article
- Multi-center and multi-vendor evaluation study across 1.5 T and 3 T scanners (part 1): apparent diffusion coefficient standardization in a diffusion MRI phantom.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Optimization of flip angle and radiofrequency pulse phase to maximize steady-state magnetization in three-dimensional missing pulse steady-state free precession.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Contrastive semi-supervised harmonization of single-shell to multi-shell diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
- Empirical field mapping for gradient nonlinearity correction of multi-site diffusion weighted MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2021Article
- Oscillating diffusion-encoding with a high gradient-amplitude and high slew-rate head-only gradient for human brain imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Peripheral nerve stimulation limits of a high amplitude and slew rate magnetic field gradient coil for neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Distortion-free imaging: A double encoding method (DIADEM) combined with multiband imaging for rapid distortion-free high-resolution diffusion imaging on a compact 3T with high-performance gradients.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Article
- Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2020
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGradient nonlinearity (GNL) leads to biased apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in diffusion-weighted imaging. A gradient nonlinearity correction (GNLC) method has been developed for whole body systems, but is yet to be tested for the new compact 3T (C3T) scanner, which exhibits more complex GNL due to its asymmetrical design. PURPOSE: To assess the improvement of ADC quantification with GNLC for the C3T scanner. STUDY TYPE: Phantom measurements and retrospective analysis of patient data. PHANTOM/SUBJECTS: A diffusion quality control phantom with vials containing 0-30% polyvinylpyrrolidone in water was used. For in vivo data, 12 patient exams were analyzed (median age, 33). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Imaging was performed on the C3T and two commercial 3T scanners. A clinical DWI (repetition time [TR] = 10,000 msec, echo time [TE] = minimum, b = 1000 s/mm ASSESSMENT: The 0% vial was measured along three orthogonal axes, and at two different temperatures. The ADC for each concentration was compared between the C3T and two whole-body scanners. Cerebrospinal fluid and white matter ADCs were quantified for each patient and compared to values in literature. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
resultsFor all PVP concentrations, the corrected ADC was within 2.5% of the reference ADC. On average, the ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and white matter post-GNLC were within 1% and 6%, respectively, of values reported in the literature and were significantly different from the uncorrected data (P < 0.05). DATA
conclusionThis study demonstrated that GNL effects were more severe for the C3T due to the asymmetric gradient design, but our implementation of a GNLC compensated for these effects, resulting in ADC values that are in good agreement with values from the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1498-1507.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.