ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019
Ultrastructural and optogenetic dissection of V1 corticotectal terminal synaptic properties.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBLN2 promoter enables genetic access to wide-field neurons of the tree shrew superior colliculus.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Behavioral Modulation and Molecular Definition of Wide-Field Vertical Cells in the Mouse Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Genetically defined neuron types underlying visuomotor transformation in the superior colliculus.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Retinal input integration in excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the mouse superior colliculus in vivo.eLife · 2023Article
- Synaptic properties of mouse tecto-parabigeminal pathways.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023Article
- Characterization of primary visual cortex input to specific cell types in the superior colliculus.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
- Ultrastructure of ipsilateral and contralateral tectopulvinar projections in the mouse.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2022Article
- Unraveling circuits of visual perception and cognition through the superior colliculus.Neuron · 2021Review
- GABAergic cell types in the superficial layers of the mouse superior colliculus.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The superior colliculus (SC) is a major site of sensorimotor integration in which sensory inputs are processed to initiate appropriate motor responses. Projections from the primary visual cortex (V1) to the SC have been shown to exert a substantial influence on visually induced behavior, including "freezing." However, it is unclear how V1 corticotectal terminals affect SC circuits to mediate these effects. To investigate this, we used anatomical and optogenetic techniques to examine the synaptic properties of V1 corticotectal terminals. Electron microscopy revealed that V1 corticotectal terminals labeled by anterograde transport primarily synapse (93%) on dendrites that do not contain gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA). This preference was confirmed using optogenetic techniques to photoactivate V1 corticotectal terminals in slices of the SC maintained in vitro. In a mouse line in which GABAergic SC interneurons express green fluorescent protein (GFP), few GFP-labeled cells (11%) responded to activation of corticotectal terminals. In contrast, 67% of non-GABAergic cells responded to activation of V1 corticotectal terminals. Biocytin-labeling of recorded neurons revealed that wide-field vertical (WFV) and non-WFV cells were activated by V1 corticotectal inputs. However, WFV cells were activated in the most uniform manner; 85% of these cells responded with excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) that maintained stable amplitudes when activated with light trains at 1-20 Hz. In contrast, in the majority of non-WFV cells, the amplitude of evoked EPSPs varied across trials. Our results suggest that V1 corticotectal projections may initiate freezing behavior via uniform activation of the WFV cells, which project to the pulvinar nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.