Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255804›Full record

GuidelineJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

The role of exercise testing in predicting successful ambulation with a lower extremity prosthesis: a systematic literature review and clinical practice guideline.

Tyler D Klenow, Larry J Mengelkoch, Phillip M Stevens, Chris A Ràbago, Owen T Hill, Gail A Latlief, Rodrigo Ruiz-Gamboa, M Jason Highsmith

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler D KlenowOrthotic & Prosthetic Centers, Inc, 3005 Caring Way, Suite 3, Port Charlotte, FL, 33952, USA. tklenow@opcenters.com.
Larry J MengelkochUniversity of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Phillip M StevensHanger Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Chris A RàbagoCenter for the Intrepid, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Owen T HillExtremity Trauma & Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE), San Antonio Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Gail A LatliefDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Regional Amputation Center, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Rodrigo Ruiz-GamboaLee Physician Group, Department of Vascular Surgery, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
M Jason HighsmithExtremity Trauma & Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE), James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Clinical Physiology Associates · USJoint Base San Antonio · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of St. Augustine for Health Sciences · USUniversity of Utah · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing discontent with the k-level system for functional classification of patients with limb loss and movement of healthcare toward evidence-based practice has resulted in the need for alternative forms of functional classification and development of clinical practice guidelines to improve access to quality prosthetic interventions. The purpose of this project was to develop and present a clinical practice recommendation for exercise testing in prosthetic patient care based on the results and synthesis of a systematic literature review.

methodsDatabase searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane were conducted and articles reviewed. Of the potential 1386 articles 10 met the criteria for inclusion. These articles were assessed using the critical appraisal tool of the United Kingdom National Service Framework for Long-Term Conditions. Of the 10 included articles eight were of high, one of medium, and one of low, quality. Data from these articles were synthesized into 6 empirical evidence statements, all qualifying for research grade A. These statements were used to develop the proposed clinical practice guideline.

resultsWhile the results of this systematic review were not able to support the direct connection between cardiorespiratory performance and K-levels, the literature did support the ability of exercise testing results to predict successful prosthetic ambulation in some demographics. Both continuous maximum-intensity single lower extremity ergometer propelled by a sound limb and intermittent submaximal upper extremity ergometer protocols were found to be viable evaluation tools of cardiorespiratory fitness and function in the target population.

conclusionThe ability to sustain an exercise intensity of ≥50% of a predicted VO

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsExercise TestAmputeesHumansLower ExtremityAerobic capacityAmputeeArtificial limbErgometryLimb lossRehabilitationWork load

Identifiers

PMID30255804
PMCPMC6156901
OpenAlexW2889879902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.