Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30255781›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Effects of family conversation on health care practices in Ethiopia: a propensity score matched analysis.

Dessalew Emaway Altaye, Ali Mehryar Karim, Wuleta Betemariam, Nebreed Fesseha Zemichael, Tesfaye Shigute, Pauline Scheelbeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dessalew Emaway AltayeThe Last Ten Kilometers Project (L10K) 2020, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Bole Sub-City, Kebele 03/05, Hs #, 2111, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. dessalew_emaway@et.jsi.com.
Ali Mehryar KarimJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 1616 N Fort Myer Dr, 16th Floor, Arlington, VA, 22209, USA.
Wuleta BetemariamThe Last Ten Kilometers Project (L10K) 2020, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Bole Sub-City, Kebele 03/05, Hs #, 2111, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nebreed Fesseha ZemichaelThe Last Ten Kilometers Project (L10K) 2020, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Bole Sub-City, Kebele 03/05, Hs #, 2111, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tesfaye ShiguteThe Last Ten Kilometers Project (L10K) 2020, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Bole Sub-City, Kebele 03/05, Hs #, 2111, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pauline ScheelbeekDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and newborn mortality rates in Ethiopia are among the highest in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of deaths take place during childbirth or within the following 48 h. Therefore, ensuring facility deliveries with emergency obstetric and newborn care services available and immediate postnatal follow-up are key strategies to increase survival. In early 2014, the Family Conversation was implemented in 115 rural districts in Ethiopia, covering about 17 million people. It aimed to reduce maternal and newborn mortality by promoting institutional delivery, early postnatal care and immediate newborn care practices. More than 6000 Health Extension Workers were trained to initiate home-based Family Conversations with pregnant women and key household decision-makers. These conversations included discussions on birth preparedness, postpartum and newborn care needs to engage key household stakeholders in supporting women during their pregnancy, labor and postpartum periods. This paper examines the effects of the Family Conversation strategy on maternal and neonatal care practices.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data from a representative sample of 4684 women with children aged 0-11 months from 115 districts collected between December 2014 and January 2015. We compared intrapartum and newborn care practices related to the most recent childbirth, between those who reported having participated in a Family Conversation during pregnancy, and those who had not. Propensity score matched analysis was used to estimate average treatment effects of the Family Conversation strategy on intrapartum and newborn care practices, including institutional delivery, early postnatal and immediate breastfeeding.

resultsAbout 17% of the respondents reported having had a Family Conversation during their last pregnancy. Average treatment effects of 7, 12, 9 and 16 percentage-points respectively were found for institutional deliveries, early postnatal care, clean cord care and thermal care of the newborn (p < 0.05).

conclusionWe found evidence that Family Conversation, and specifically the involvement of household members who were major decision-makers, was associated with better intrapartum and newborn care practices. This study adds to the evidence base that involving husbands and mothers-in-law, as well as pregnant women, in behavior change communication interventions could be critical for improving maternal and newborn care and therewith lowering mortality rates.

Indexed as

CommunicationFamilyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedEthiopiaFamily conversationMaternalNewbornOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID30255781
PMCPMC6157286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.